Nasdaq Board Diversity Proposal Highlights Importance of ESG Issues, Increased D&O Risks
Time 3 Minute Read
Categories: D&O

The Nasdaq stock market has filed a proposal with the US Securities and Exchange Commission requesting permission to enforce new rules aimed at advancing diversity among board members of Nasdaq-listed companies and increasing disclosure of diversity statistics. Investors and shareholders have devoted significant attention (and several lawsuits) in recent years to addressing environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) issues at the board level. Nasdaq’s proposal would bring diversity to the forefront of the boardroom, as well as present new compliance obligations and possible D&O exposures to companies subject to the proposed listing requirements.

Over the past several years, public companies have been subject to increased litigation exposure due to so-called “event-driven” securities lawsuits, where plaintiffs have focused on adverse events impacting company operations or financials as opposed to more traditional claims of misrepresentations or omissions in securities filings. Many of those claims, which can be covered by directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, have been driven by ESG factors, including alleged poor oversight and corporate governance, failure to address climate change, or mistreatment of employees and other workers in the supply chain.

The Nasdaq proposal underscores the important ESG issue of board diversity—which has been shown to be as important as revenue growth in predicting a company’s long-term success—by requiring listed companies to publicly disclose board-level diversity statistics within one year of the SEC’s approval of the proposed rule. The timeframe to meet the minimum board diversity expectations varies by listing tiers, but companies must either meet the board composition objectives within the applicable period or provide a public explanation of why the objectives cannot be met. Companies that fail to comply are subject to notice of deficiencies or delisting.

D&O liability insurance affords protection to companies and their officers and directors from lawsuits targeting company disclosures, decision making, and corporate governance issues. Nasdaq-listed companies that either fail to comply with proposed diversity recommendations outlined in the new proposal or provide what investors deem to be an inadequate or insufficient explanation of why board composition objectives are not met could be subject to additional scrutiny. Deviation from Nasdaq’s recommendations or information gleaned from the added board composition disclosures could serve as new data points for putative securities plaintiffs monitoring correlation between stock price and adverse events. Compliance with these and other important ESG objectives should remain top-of-mind as policyholders are placing or renewing D&O policies in the coming months.

  • Partner

    Geoff works closely with corporate policyholders and their directors and officers to resolve high-stakes insurance disputes. He leads the firm’s directors and officers (D&O) insurance and executive protection practice.

    As a ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 6 Minute Read

Risk professionals and insurers alike continue to monitor the rapid evolution and deployment of  artificial intelligence (AI). With increased understanding comes increased efforts to manage and limit exposure. Exclusions to coverage offer insurers potentially broad protection against evolving AI risk. Most recently, one insurer, Berkley, has introduced the first so-called “Absolute” AI exclusion in several specialty lines of liability coverage, signaling an even broader effort to compartmentalize AI risk.

Time 1 Minute Read

In a recent Client Alert, Hunton insurance partner Geoffrey Fehling discusses the impact of the California appellate court decision Practice Fusion, Inc. v. Freedom Specialty Insurance Co., where the court denied coverage under a directors and officers liability policy for a software developer’s $118 million settlement with the US Department of Justice to resolve allegations that the company violated anti-kickback laws in designing and implementing sponsored alerts in electronic health records software. 

Time 3 Minute Read

We have previewed in prior posts the ways artificial intelligence is rapidly changing the way business operate, including the many ways AI has influenced the insurance market, creating both opportunities and risks for policyholders. We later highlighted, based on a recent securities lawsuit, how corporate management may be at risk for the alleged use or misuse of AI and how companies should evaluate their directors and officers (D&O) and management liability policies to ensure that they are prepared to respond to and mitigate AI-driven risks, including claims alleging that a company or its officers and directors made misrepresentations about AI.

Time 4 Minute Read

As explained in a recent alert, now is the time for public companies to adopt compliant clawback policies. This is because the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently approved final rules on June 9, 2023, that required national securities exchanges like the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the Nasdaq to implement new listing standards requiring public companies to institute compliant incentive-based compensation clawback policies. The NYSE and Nasdaq rules require listed companies to adopt clawback policies by December 1, 2023, which policies must apply to incentive compensation awarded after October 2, 2023. As public companies prepare to adopt compliant policies before the December 1, 2023 deadline, they should not only consider the clawback policy itself, but also the overlap between that policy and any applicable directors and officers (D&O) liability insurance. Doing so is important to address the potential new exposures created by the new SEC rules.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page