New York Commercial Division Clarifies How Claims Will Be Valued
Time 2 Minute Read

The New York Commercial Division, the specialized arm of the New York State Supreme Court composed of justices experienced in handling complex civil matters, recently amended its rules to clarify how actions seeking equitable or declaratory relief will be valued for purposes of meeting the Commercial Division’s monetary thresholds. See AO/038/25 (Jan. 28, 2025).

In order to qualify for assignment to the Commercial Division, the relief sought in an action must exceed a certain monetary value, which varies from county to county. In New York County, for example, actions must meet the monetary threshold of $500,000. NYCRR 202.70(a).

The rule change clarifies how actions seeking equitable or declaratory relief are valued. Going forward, whether such actions meet the Commercial Division’s monetary threshold will be measured by the “value of the object of the action,” defined as “the value of the suit’s intended benefit, the value of the right being protected, or the value of the injury being averted, whichever is greatest.” NYCRR 202.70(b). The court will assess the value based on the Commercial Division addendum filed with the Request for Judicial Intervention, as well as the allegations in the operative pleadings when the case is sought to be assigned to the Commercial Division.

The rule change provides litigants and Commercial Division justices with much-needed guidance for evaluating the monetary value of actions seeking equitable or declaratory relief and whether such actions qualify for assignment to the Commercial Division.

For more information about the rules governing the Commercial Division, please refer to the series on this subject published by the authors in the New York Law Journal.

  • Associate

    Charlotte advises policyholders in complex insurance coverage matters. Charlotte represents policyholders in insurance coverage actions in federal and state courts across the country.  Her work includes environmental ...

  • Partner

    Kevin is a commercial litigator focusing on insurance coverage disputes and counseling on behalf of policyholders. His educational background and prior experience as an insurance broker and advisor provide him with a deep ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 5 Minute Read

A recent summary judgment order is a reminder that, in insurance coverage disputes, straightforward arguments can still win the day. In a coverage action arising from dozens of underlying personal injury suits, the court adopted a clear, text-based approach to the duty to defend—and ordered the insurer to provide a defense.

Time 3 Minute Read

The post-COVID real estate market has seen a surge in luxury gyms and fitness spaces.  Members are willing to shell out several hundred dollars a month for memberships at popular high-end fitness chains. These modern luxury gyms offer more than just workout spaces.  Many offer holistic lifestyle services such as spas, hair salons, social amenities, co-working spaces, and daycare. These luxury gyms are gaining larger footprints and emerging as a unique retail asset.

Time 3 Minute Read

On Feb. 23, 2026, New York Governor Kathy Hochul announced that the New York Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”) had published proposed rules implementing the state’s Buy Now, Pay Later (“BNPL”) law.  The proposal would establish the nation’s first comprehensive regulatory framework for the rapidly growing pay-over-time consumer market niche. 

Time 2 Minute Read

In 2025, four states—California, Massachusetts, New York, and Washington—proposed fashion accountability bills. These bills would require high-earning entities in the fashion industry to conduct extensive supply chain due diligence, and to monitor and report greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, water use, and chemical management.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page