Product Recalls: Keeping Your Insurance Coverage Intact
Time 1 Minute Read
Categories: Property

Product recalls are on the rise in many industries. As regulatory and consumer protection standards are getting tougher, product supply chains are becoming more complex. This increases the risk of errors, defects and contamination at all levels of operation. Too often, these problems do not manifest themselves until after a product hits the market. All of this can lead to staggering expenses for food and product manufacturers facing the risks and realities of product recalls.

To protect against the substantial and wide-ranging costs associated with recalling a product, many businesses purchase insurance policies geared specifically for expenses, lost income, and claims arising from recalls. These targeted policies can save a company, but they also are susceptible to rescission. In a recent article published in Corporate Counsel, Hunton insurance coverage attorneys Syed S. Ahmad and Paul T. Moura comment on a recent Third Circuit decision that illustrates the importance of taking the right steps to avoid invalidating insurance coverage for product recalls.

Read The Rescission Trap: Don’t Let Product Recalls Contaminate Your Coverage

  • Partner

    Mike is a Legal 500 and Chambers USA-ranked lawyer with more than 25 years of experience litigating insurance disputes and advising clients on insurance coverage matters.

    Mike Levine is a partner in the firm’s Washington, DC ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

Producer associations launch Textile Renewal Alliance as a prospective PRO to implement California’s textile EPR law.

Time 5 Minute Read

As participation in Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) programs continues to grow in the US, the financial burden of developing recycling infrastructure is being transferred to producers of products that fall under the EPR mandates. Since our last update in January, several key developments across multiple jurisdictions have occurred, including the beginning of several state programs.

Time 7 Minute Read

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently found that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) failed to properly consider advances in wastewater treatment technology and ordered EPA to reconsider updating the effluent limitations guidelines (ELGs) for seven industrial categories.

Time 4 Minute Read

While millions have been captivated by Wayfarer Studio’s production of “It Ends With Us,” a lesser-known but real-life insurance drama is unfolding off-screen. Last week, Harco National Insurance Company found itself in the spotlight when it filed a declaratory judgment action against its insureds, including, among others, Wayfarer Studios LLC, It Ends With Us Movie LLC and Justin Baldoni (jointly “Defendants”) asserting it has no obligation to defend the claims brought against Defendants by Blake Lively in Lively v. Wayfarer Studios, et al., U.S.D.C., S.D.N.Y. Case No. 1:24-cv-10049-LJL (the “Underlying Action”). 

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page