Recent Suit Filed in California Federal Court May Offer Glimpse Into Adjudicating RWI Disputes
Time 2 Minute Read

A software company—Zywave, Inc. (“Zywave”)—recently filed a lawsuit in California federal court that may provide rare insight into how courts will resolve representations and warranties (“R&W”) insurance coverage disputes. Zywave purchased a buyer-side R&W policy in connection with its acquisition of an insurance product-distribution software company. Zywave alleged that, post-close, it learned that the seller had knowledge of “serious material performance issues with certain customers that it failed to disclose,” amounting to breaches of various sections of the acquisition agreement. The software company further alleged that if the seller had disclosed the performance issues, the software company would have either walked away from the transaction or paid a lower purchase price.

After submitting a notice of claim for indemnification to the seller, Zywave also gave its insurer notice of a claim under the R&W policy. The software company alleged that the insurer admitted that the seller likely committed a breach with respect to two “Material Contracts.” But, despite the admission, the insurer refused to pay the software company for any losses related to the seller’s breach. Accordingly, Zywave brought a declaratory judgment and breach of contract action, captioned Zywave, Inc. v. Travelers Excess and Surplus Lines Company, against the insurer in the Central District of California. The software company is seeking losses in excess of the $10 million policy limit, in addition to other fees and costs associated with the pursuit of its claims. 

R&W insurance is still a relatively new product and historically the policies required any dispute to be resolved through confidential arbitration. As such, there is very little case law addressing the issues that arise between insurers and policyholders. In recent years, policies have started offering the policyholder the option to arbitrate disputes confidentially or litigate them publicly in the courts. The Zywave v. Travelers lawsuit is a recent example of a policyholder asking a court to resolve an R&W coverage dispute. The case is only in the beginning stages of litigation, but it may provide an opportunity for much needed guidance on common R&W coverage issues. Stay tuned for updates on the litigation. 

  • Partner

    Syed represents clients in connection with insurance coverage, reinsurance matters and other business litigation. Syed serves as the head of the firm’s insurance coverage practice. He has been admitted to the US Court of Appeals ...

  • Associate

    Jae Lynn focuses her practice on advising policyholders in cross-border insurance coverage disputes and representations and warranties matters. In addition to providing policyholders with advice in complex insurance ...

  • Partner

    Kevin is a commercial litigator focusing on insurance coverage disputes and counseling on behalf of policyholders. His educational background and prior experience as an insurance broker and advisor provide him with a deep ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 1 Minute Read

Aon released a recent report titled “2025 Transaction Solutions Global Claims Study: Managing Deal Risk to Secure Investments and Enhance Returns.” That report described over $300 million in representation and warranties insurance claim payouts for North American clients, a record annual total. Aon also reported that the median payment size was $5.5 million, indicating significant recovery on noticed claims. Hunton partner Syed Ahmad was recently quoted in a Law360 article, commenting that the market for M&A insurance is largely driven by the underlying deal activity. He added that “[r]ecoveries at this rate can also influence perceptions and increase the demand for these products by repeat players in the marketplace.”

Time 4 Minute Read

Novolex Holdings, LLC v. Illinois Union Insurance Company is one of the few cases involving a claim under a Representation and Warranties (“R&W”) policy playing out in a public forum because most R&W cases are resolved before a formal dispute and often don’t reach litigation. In addition, most R&W policies provide the policyholder with the option to have the dispute resolved through arbitration, which many clients may prefer so as to avoid the public scrutiny of a court case. Novolex, however, is one of the few cases that has proceeded to litigation.

Time 7 Minute Read

Representations and warranties coverage disputes are far more often resolved through informal or confidential proceedings rather than litigation. Law 360 recently published an article by Hunton insurance counsel Syed Ahmad, Patrick McDermott, and Jae Lynn Huckaba analyzing a rare representations and warranties dispute in the summary judgment stage of litigation between pH Beauty Holdings III Inc. and its representation and warranties insurers. As summarized below, the authors provide an overview of the issues in dispute, which related to the RWI retention, an exclusion related to the purchase price adjustment following closing, and pH Beauty’s bad faith claim.

Time 2 Minute Read

The explosive growth of representations and warranties (R&W) insurance over the last decade is no secret.  But, for many, R&W insurance remains an enigma, particularly as respects filing a claim under such policies.  Indeed, even those involved in buying R&W insurance may not have experience on the claims end and, as a result, possess little knowledge on how to navigate the assortment of issues that may arise.  Of course, policyholders pursuing a claim under an R&W policy should be aware of the minefield of issues that await in establishing the two primary thresholds to recovery: breach ...

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page