Representation and Warranties Insurance Fundamentals
Time 2 Minute Read

The explosive growth of representations and warranties (R&W) insurance over the last decade is no secret.  But, for many, R&W insurance remains an enigma, particularly as respects filing a claim under such policies.  Indeed, even those involved in buying R&W insurance may not have experience on the claims end and, as a result, possess little knowledge on how to navigate the assortment of issues that may arise.  Of course, policyholders pursuing a claim under an R&W policy should be aware of the minefield of issues that await in establishing the two primary thresholds to recovery: breach and loss.  For example, insurers will scrutinize whether a breach of a representation has occurred, often requiring a hyper-technical showing of breach that may not align with the policyholders’ views.  Similarly, quantifying the loss resulting from the breach is rarely straightforward and often a source of dispute between insurer and policyholder, particularly as it concerns the use of a multiple. 

Recently, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP attorneys Syed Ahmad, Patrick McDermott, and Kevin Small published a Lexis Practical Guidance note covering the fundamentals of R&W insurance that may be a useful resource for those wanting to learn more about R&W insurance and, in particular, the various issues that may come up when filing a claim.  The note explains the R&W insurance product and the underwriting process.  It then provides a detailed description of the claim process and identifies common areas of dispute when establishing breach and loss.  A copy of the note may be found here

  • Partner

    Syed represents clients in connection with insurance coverage, reinsurance matters and other business litigation. Syed serves as the head of the firm’s insurance coverage practice. He has been admitted to the US Court of Appeals ...

  • Counsel

    Patrick counsels clients on all aspects of insurance and reinsurance coverage. He assists clients in obtaining appropriate coverage and represents clients in resolving disputes over coverage, including in litigation and ...

  • Partner

    Kevin is a commercial litigator focusing on insurance coverage disputes and counseling on behalf of policyholders. His educational background and prior experience as an insurance broker and advisor provide him with a deep ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 1 Minute Read

Aon released a recent report titled “2025 Transaction Solutions Global Claims Study: Managing Deal Risk to Secure Investments and Enhance Returns.” That report described over $300 million in representation and warranties insurance claim payouts for North American clients, a record annual total. Aon also reported that the median payment size was $5.5 million, indicating significant recovery on noticed claims. Hunton partner Syed Ahmad was recently quoted in a Law360 article, commenting that the market for M&A insurance is largely driven by the underlying deal activity. He added that “[r]ecoveries at this rate can also influence perceptions and increase the demand for these products by repeat players in the marketplace.”

Time 9 Minute Read

The trend of Delaware court decisions favoring policyholders continues with a favorable ruling in AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. v. XL Specialty Insurance Company, et al. The Delaware trial court found that AMC’s settlement payment, made in the form of AMC shares valued at $99.3 million, qualified as a covered “Loss” under its directors and officers (D&O) liability insurance policy. This ruling is noteworthy for a variety of reasons, particularly because it establishes that non-traditional forms of currency, like stock, can be a covered “Loss” under D&O policies.

Time 4 Minute Read

Novolex Holdings, LLC v. Illinois Union Insurance Company is one of the few cases involving a claim under a Representation and Warranties (“R&W”) policy playing out in a public forum because most R&W cases are resolved before a formal dispute and often don’t reach litigation. In addition, most R&W policies provide the policyholder with the option to have the dispute resolved through arbitration, which many clients may prefer so as to avoid the public scrutiny of a court case. Novolex, however, is one of the few cases that has proceeded to litigation.

Time 2 Minute Read

A software company—Zywave, Inc. (“Zywave”)—recently filed a lawsuit in California federal court that may provide rare insight into how courts will resolve representations and warranties (“R&W”) insurance coverage disputes. Zywave purchased a buyer-side R&W policy in connection with its acquisition of an insurance product-distribution software company. Zywave alleged that, post-close, it learned that the seller had knowledge of “serious material performance issues with certain customers that it failed to disclose,” amounting to breaches of various sections of the acquisition agreement. The software company further alleged that if the seller had disclosed the performance issues, the software company would have either walked away from the transaction or paid a lower purchase price.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page