Webinar on the SAFETY Act, Security and Insurance
Time 2 Minute Read
Categories: Cyber, Industry News

Recent headlines underscore the security challenges faced by public-facing businesses. From physical threats to cyber attacks targeting a wide range of critical infrastructure, companies in diverse sectors, such as the financial, retail, entertainment, energy, transportation, real estate, communications and other areas, face a challenging landscape of risks and potential liabilities. Join us on October 28, 2019, at 12:00 p.m. EST, for a webinar to discuss these issues, including why companies should consider SAFETY Act protection and how to obtain it.

Those exposed to these threats, including providers of security services and products, face the potential of bodily injury to customers and employees, serious damage to facilities and operations, extended business disruption, and significant reputational harm as well as years of costly litigation – notwithstanding best efforts to protect against dangerous persons and events. The SAFETY Act, administered by the Department of Homeland Security, is coming of age as an important tool to reduce risk and limit liability. Congress passed the SAFETY Act in the wake of the 9/11 attacks for the purpose of limiting the third-party liability of companies with sound security programs or services. A SAFETY Act designation or certification complements a company’s traditional insurance policies to mitigate the potential liabilities from a cyber or physical attack.

In this webinar, participants will learn why companies in various sectors are seeking SAFETY Act protection and how to obtain it. We also will provide key suggestions on how to structure an insurance program to avoid gaps and pitfalls in today’s interconnected economy.

Speakers

  • Bruce Cohen, SVP, Client Executive, Lockton Companies
  • Kevin Jones, Partner, Hunton Andrews Kurth
  • Lorie Masters, Partner, Hunton Andrews Kurth
  • Paul Tiao, Partner, Hunton Andrews Kurth
  • Dave Wong, VP, FireEye Mandiant Consulting

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 1 Minute Read

If recent years have taught insurance practitioners anything, it is that the most consequential coverage disputes rarely turn on novelty alone. In 2025, courts continued to resolve high‑stakes insurance disputes by returning to first principles—examining when claims are related, how losses and occurrences are defined and aggregated, and how policy language allocates risk across time and conduct. D&O coverage and other core insurance law issues again occupied center stage, while decisions in property, cyber, and liability disputes reinforced a familiar theme: policy interpretation remains the decisive factor in determining whether coverage is available in an increasingly complex claims environment. As the decisions discussed below demonstrate, 2025 confirmed that even as risks evolve, coverage disputes remain grounded in careful, policy‑specific analysis.

Time 4 Minute Read

In today’s digital world, data breaches due to vendor failures are becoming increasingly common, often resulting in costly fallout. While insurance can provide a safety net, the interaction between cyber insurance and vendor contracts is crucial for effective recovery and risk management. Vendor contracts should not be treated as mere formalities but as vital frameworks that contain specific, detailed provisions regarding data security obligations to ensure accountability and minimize vulnerabilities.

Time 4 Minute Read

In today’s digital world, data breaches due to vendor failures are becoming increasingly common, often resulting in costly fallout. While insurance can provide a safety net, the interaction between cyber insurance and vendor contracts is crucial for effective recovery and risk management. Vendor contracts should not be treated as mere formalities but as vital frameworks that contain specific, detailed provisions regarding data security obligations to ensure accountability and minimize vulnerabilities.

Time 5 Minute Read

Theft in the cargo industry has skyrocketed in recent years. In the first half of 2024, cargo thefts rose 49 percent and the average loss per shipment by 83 percent. Given these dramatic spikes in cargo theft, policyholders whose operations rely on the safe transportation and trade of cargo should take steps to mitigate against the potential losses of a cargo-theft event. We discuss below the insurance coverage options available to policyholders that can help protect against the risks and losses associated with cargo-related theft if such a loss occurs.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page