Cryptocurrency and the Concern for Retailers
Time 2 Minute Read

Due to volatile and record-breaking valuations, cryptocurrencies and their underlying technology, blockchain, have been at the forefront of financial news headlines. Blockchain technology is, very simply, a decentralized digital ledger that records economic transactions in a way that cannot be copied or destroyed, therefore eliminating fraudulent or duplicative transactions. Bitcoin is perhaps the best known cryptocurrency, and for which blockchain technology was invented. Bitcoins are discovered through “mining,” a process whereby computers use processing power to solve difficult puzzles. The miner who finds the solution receives bitcoins, essentially digital tokens, as a reward. Unlike traditional currencies, bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies do not require a third party or central authority for its users to transfer value. 

Bitcoin has surged in value since its creation in 2009. Professional and casual investors alike have bought bitcoin in droves over the past months. Despite the potential opportunity for significant returns on investment, investors are questioning if cryptocurrencies are stable enough to continuously yield returns. One major hurdle to the future stability of cryptocurrency is its overall liquidity. Increases in the volume of bitcoin trading has enhanced its liquidity, however, widespread acceptance of cryptocurrency by merchants and retailers may be necessary to reduce its volatility and further improve bitcoin’s overall liquidity.

Though widespread acceptance by merchants could help stabilize cryptocurrency, the current volatility is a concern for retailers. Additionally, the IRS presently classifies cryptocurrency as property, not as currency. This classification means that cryptocurrencies must be valued at their fair market value, which may pose problems for vendors accepting the wildly fluctuating bitcoin. Retailers also worry about blockchain technology’s scalability problem—its inability to efficiently process a growing number of transactions. When transactions take longer to process, transaction fees increase and small cryptocurrency transactions become uneconomical.

While the surge in bitcoin’s value towards the end of 2017 created considerable interest among investors, that surge has not necessarily correlated with a material change in its application or increased mainstream acceptance of cryptocurrencies as a form of payment. While there are a few companies that currently accept cryptocurrencies as payment, it is unclear whether more retailers will accept bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies at any time in the near future. But if more retailers and online companies do choose to accept cryptocurrency, large retailers—especially large online retailers—may consider accepting it in order to maintain their share of the market.

  • Senior Attorney

    Jessica’s practice focuses on commercial real estate, real estate development and land use law. Jessica is an associate on the firm’s real estate development and finance team. Jessica’s practice focuses on zoning and land ...

  • Partner

    Mark’s practice focuses on commercial real estate transactions across a variety of industries, including in the retail, office and healthcare sectors. His experience includes (i) the representation of healthcare systems in ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

On June 20, 2025, Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed into law SB 21, an act establishing a Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. The act is immediately in effect.

Time 2 Minute Read

On March 6, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order entitled “Establishment of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and United States Digital Asset Stockpile.” It is the latest effort in the President’s sweeping reforms concerning the digital asset industry.

Time 3 Minute Read

In a reversal of a policy that has spanned two administrations, on January 10, 2024, the SEC approved applications for 11 Bitcoin spot exchange traded funds, or ETFs. The SEC approved the order by a 3-2 vote, with Chair Gensler forming a majority with the two Republican commissioners, and the two Democratic commissioners voting against the action.

Time 4 Minute Read

From IRS rulings that “virtual currency” is taxed as “property” to an SEC lawsuit claiming that digital assets are “securities” under federal law, meteoric growth of the largely unregulated crypto industry has raised numerous questions about whether crypto-related risks are covered by insurance. In the latest example of the intersection of crypto and insurance, a California federal court recently held that cryptocurrency stolen from a Coinbase account did not constitute a covered loss under a homeowner’s insurance policy. The fundamental issue was whether the stolen crypto met the policy’s requirement for “direct physical loss to property” and, more specifically, whether the losses were “physical” in nature. The court ruled against coverage, reasoning that lost control of cryptocurrency is not a direct physical loss as a matter of California law.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page