Retail Industry Group Opposes Point-of-Sale Registration for Drones
Time 2 Minute Read

This month, the Retail Industry Leaders Association (“RILA”) submitted comments to the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) opposing a point-of-sale registration requirement for recreational drones. While the trade association generally supports the registration of drones, also known as unmanned aircraft systems, RILA called the point-of-sale registration process “costly, inefficient, and difficult to implement” while warning of potential data privacy concerns for consumers.

The comments were in response to the release of an FAA Interim Final Rulemaking in December called Registration and Marking Requirements for Small Unmanned Aircraft, 80 Fed. Reg. 78594. As the rule currently stands, registration is mandatory before the first time a drone is used outdoors. Drone owners are required to register their drones for a $5 fee, which will result in a Certificate of Aircraft Registration and Proof of Ownership. The registration also will include an identification number which owners are required to mark on their drones. Existing drone owners must register their drones on the FAA website by February 19th, 2016.

The FAA’s Federal Register Notice asked for public comments about a number of potential changes to its drone registration process. RILA’s comment expressed the group’s preference for maintaining the current prior-to-operation registration requirements as opposed to a point-of-sale registration requirement. RILA’s comment stated that a point-of-sale registration process would shift costs to retailers, who would need to collect, store and transfer personal customer data to the FAA, while creating privacy concerns for consumers. In addition, RILA pointed out an inherent problem with point-of-sale drone registration: customers purchasing drones as gifts for others would make the process more confusing for both the purchaser and the end user.

The FAA Interim Final Rulemaking was implemented only days before Christmas 2015, during the peak holiday shopping season, and the FAA chose to carry out the more expedient option of a prior-to-operation registration mandate in order to facilitate drone registration during a busy retail period. However, the Interim Final Rule Notice in the Federal Register did indicate the FAA’s strong willingness to consider a point-of-sale registration requirement.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 1 Minute Read

In California, shoppers will no longer be offered plastic bags at the grocery store checkout. Under a new law, effective January 1, 2026, single-use shopping bags are banned from any point of sale. This includes bags made from plastic, paper, or other materials that are not recycled paper or certified reusable bags. However, the ban does not apply to bags used before the point of sale, such as produce bags and overwrap for fresh meat.

Time 1 Minute Read

As recently reported on the Hunton Retail Law Resource blog, Washington State became the first-in-the-nation to pass an almost complete ban on the manufacture and sale of cookware containing lead in March 2024. Starting in January 2026, HB 1551 sets the maximum lead content level for cookware and cookware components at five (5) parts per million (ppm). The law is both broad in scope and stringent in its lead limit, making it important for entities that sell cookware or offer cookware for sale in the state of Washington to begin thinking about compliance now. 

Time 3 Minute Read

In March 2024, Washington State became the first-in-the-nation to pass an almost complete ban on the manufacture and sale of cookware containing lead. Starting in January 2026, HB 1551 sets the maximum lead content level for cookware and cookware components at five (5) parts per million (ppm). The law is both broad in scope and stringent in its lead limit, making it important for entities that sell cookware or offer cookware for sale in the state of Washington to begin thinking about compliance now.

Time 15 Minute Read

The Chevron doctrine – the bedrock principle of administrative law under which courts afforded deference to administrative agency interpretations in the face of statutory ambiguity – is no more.  On June 28, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a long-anticipated decision that addresses the authority of regulatory agencies to dictate policy and the extent to which courts will exercise their own judgment as to the meaning of a statute and how that may bound agency decisions. 

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page