During the week of April 1, 2019, the Centre for Information Policy Leadership (“CIPL”) at Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP hosted its annual executive retreat in Washington, D.C. (the “Retreat”). During the Retreat, CIPL held a full-day working session on evolving technologies and a new U.S. privacy framework followed by a closed members only half-day roundtable on global privacy trends with special guest Helen Dixon, Data Protection Commissioner of Ireland.
CIPL Executive Retreat on a New U.S. Privacy Framework
On April 2, 2019, CIPL hosted a full-day working session on “Privacy Laws and Evolving Technologies and A New U.S. Privacy Framework” at Hunton Andrews Kurth’s D.C. office. Over 100 invited guests attended the working session, including CIPL members, U.S. regulators and policy makers.
The all-day event consisted of three main sessions. Following opening remarks by CIPL President Bojana Bellamy, the Retreat commenced with a panel on privacy laws and evolving technologies, moderated by CIPL Senior Policy Advisor, Fred Cate. Experts from leading technology companies discussed whether common privacy principles are relevant and adaptable to new technologies, including AI, Machine Learning, Blockchain and IoT. Participants discussed how mature models for applying privacy to evolving technologies generally do not yet exist and that more work needs to be done to find solutions. Challenges associated with traditional FIPPs based approaches were discussed, with a particular emphasis on the issues associated with notice and choice and the importance of transparency in the new world of data.
The second session of the day shifted to a discussion around a new U.S. privacy framework. The session, entitled “Learning from the GDPR – does it contain elements that should be included in a U.S. privacy law?” focused on the experience of companies over the past year with the GDPR. The panel, consisting of global privacy leaders of multinational organizations, discussed the positive impacts garnered from their GDPR compliance efforts and the return on investment they have seen over the past year. It also addressed elements of the GDPR that may not be appropriate for incorporation into a new U.S. framework without modification and adaptation to the U.S. legal system and culture. Participants also discussed the threshold question of which businesses should be covered by a new federal law and the importance of an accountability- and risk-based approach to any new privacy framework.
The final session of the event, entitled “What should a U.S. Privacy Law Look Like?” was split into two segments – a discussion with U.S. government and regulatory representatives, moderated by CIPL Vice President and Senior Policy Counselor, Markus Heyder, and an industry panel featuring a discussion by private sector representatives, moderated by CIPL Advisor, Russell Schrader.
The government panel featured speakers from the White House National Economic Council, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, the U.S. Department of Commerce National Telecommunications and Information Administration (“NTIA”) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”). The importance of preemption to facilitate data flows and avoid an unmanageable patchwork of state laws was discussed along with the need to ensure a new U.S. framework meets the dual goals of protecting privacy and enabling innovation and the beneficial use of data. Preliminary findings from NTIA’s request for comment on Developing the Administration’s Approach to Consumer Privacy were outlined along with an explanation and status update of the new NIST privacy framework.
The industry panel was moderated by CIPL Advisor Russell Schrader and featured a discussion among U.S.-based industry leaders, as well as Hunton Andrews Kurth partner Lisa Sotto. Participants emphasized the unique opportunity presented to the U.S. to craft its own approach to privacy and that in creating a principles-based law, the elements of data stewardship must be broken down into concrete specifics. The GDPR and California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 are helpful reference models but should not act as a shortcut in creating a new privacy law.
CIPL Post-Retreat Closed Roundtable
On April 3, 2019, CIPL hosted a closed post-retreat roundtable for its members on global privacy trends. The session commenced with a keynote on the “First Year of GDPR – Key Learnings and Priorities for Continued Implementation” by special guest Helen Dixon, Data Protection Commissioner of Ireland. Dixon outlined key areas of activity for her office over the past year, provided insight into challenges for regulators under the GDPR regime and discussed enforcement activity and expectations for organizations. A Q&A session followed the keynote. After a short break, CIPL held a members-only closed session on upcoming global privacy trends.
Search
Recent Posts
- Website Use of Third-Party Tracking Software Not Prohibited Under Massachusetts Wiretap Act
- HHS Announces Additional Settlements Following Ransomware Attacks Including First Enforcement Under Risk Analysis Initiative
- Employee Monitoring: Increased Use Draws Increased Scrutiny from Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Categories
- Behavioral Advertising
- Centre for Information Policy Leadership
- Children’s Privacy
- Cyber Insurance
- Cybersecurity
- Enforcement
- European Union
- Events
- FCRA
- Financial Privacy
- General
- Health Privacy
- Identity Theft
- Information Security
- International
- Marketing
- Multimedia Resources
- Online Privacy
- Security Breach
- U.S. Federal Law
- U.S. State Law
- Workplace Privacy
Tags
- Aaron Simpson
- Accountability
- Adequacy
- Advertisement
- Advertising
- American Privacy Rights Act
- Anna Pateraki
- Anonymization
- Anti-terrorism
- APEC
- Apple Inc.
- Argentina
- Arkansas
- Article 29 Working Party
- Artificial Intelligence
- Australia
- Austria
- Automated Decisionmaking
- Baltimore
- Bankruptcy
- Belgium
- Biden Administration
- Big Data
- Binding Corporate Rules
- Biometric Data
- Blockchain
- Bojana Bellamy
- Brazil
- Brexit
- British Columbia
- Brittany Bacon
- Brussels
- Business Associate Agreement
- BYOD
- California
- CAN-SPAM
- Canada
- Cayman Islands
- CCPA
- CCTV
- Chile
- China
- Chinese Taipei
- Christopher Graham
- CIPA
- Class Action
- Clinical Trial
- Cloud
- Cloud Computing
- CNIL
- Colombia
- Colorado
- Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Compliance
- Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
- Congress
- Connecticut
- Consent
- Consent Order
- Consumer Protection
- Cookies
- COPPA
- Coronavirus/COVID-19
- Council of Europe
- Council of the European Union
- Court of Justice of the European Union
- CPPA
- CPRA
- Credit Monitoring
- Credit Report
- Criminal Law
- Critical Infrastructure
- Croatia
- Cross-Border Data Flow
- Cyber Attack
- Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
- Data Brokers
- Data Controller
- Data Localization
- Data Privacy Framework
- Data Processor
- Data Protection Act
- Data Protection Authority
- Data Protection Impact Assessment
- Data Transfer
- David Dumont
- David Vladeck
- Delaware
- Denmark
- Department of Commerce
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Department of Homeland Security
- Department of Justice
- Department of the Treasury
- District of Columbia
- Do Not Call
- Do Not Track
- Dobbs
- Dodd-Frank Act
- DPIA
- E-Privacy
- E-Privacy Directive
- Ecuador
- Ed Tech
- Edith Ramirez
- Electronic Communications Privacy Act
- Electronic Privacy Information Center
- Elizabeth Denham
- Employee Monitoring
- Encryption
- ENISA
- EU Data Protection Directive
- EU Member States
- European Commission
- European Data Protection Board
- European Data Protection Supervisor
- European Parliament
- Facial Recognition Technology
- FACTA
- Fair Credit Reporting Act
- Fair Information Practice Principles
- Federal Aviation Administration
- Federal Bureau of Investigation
- Federal Communications Commission
- Federal Data Protection Act
- Federal Trade Commission
- FERC
- FinTech
- Florida
- Food and Drug Administration
- Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
- France
- Franchise
- Fred Cate
- Freedom of Information Act
- Freedom of Speech
- Fundamental Rights
- GDPR
- Geofencing
- Geolocation
- Georgia
- Germany
- Global Privacy Assembly
- Global Privacy Enforcement Network
- Gramm Leach Bliley Act
- Hacker
- Hawaii
- Health Data
- Health Information
- HIPAA
- HIPPA
- HITECH Act
- Hong Kong
- House of Representatives
- Hungary
- Illinois
- India
- Indiana
- Indonesia
- Information Commissioners Office
- Information Sharing
- Insurance Provider
- Internal Revenue Service
- International Association of Privacy Professionals
- International Commissioners Office
- Internet
- Internet of Things
- IP Address
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Jacob Kohnstamm
- Japan
- Jason Beach
- Jay Rockefeller
- Jenna Rode
- Jennifer Stoddart
- Jersey
- Jessica Rich
- John Delionado
- John Edwards
- Kentucky
- Korea
- Latin America
- Laura Leonard
- Law Enforcement
- Lawrence Strickling
- Legislation
- Liability
- Lisa Sotto
- Litigation
- Location-Based Services
- London
- Madrid Resolution
- Maine
- Malaysia
- Markus Heyder
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Meta
- Mexico
- Microsoft
- Minnesota
- Mobile App
- Mobile Device
- Montana
- Morocco
- MySpace
- Natascha Gerlach
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- National Labor Relations Board
- National Science and Technology Council
- National Security
- National Security Agency
- National Telecommunications and Information Administration
- Nebraska
- NEDPA
- Netherlands
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New Zealand
- Nigeria
- Ninth Circuit
- North Carolina
- Norway
- Obama Administration
- OECD
- Office for Civil Rights
- Office of Foreign Assets Control
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Opt-In Consent
- Oregon
- Outsourcing
- Pakistan
- Parental Consent
- Payment Card
- PCI DSS
- Penalty
- Pennsylvania
- Personal Data
- Personal Health Information
- Personal Information
- Personally Identifiable Information
- Peru
- Philippines
- Phyllis Marcus
- Poland
- PRISM
- Privacy By Design
- Privacy Policy
- Privacy Rights
- Privacy Rule
- Privacy Shield
- Protected Health Information
- Ransomware
- Record Retention
- Red Flags Rule
- Regulation
- Rhode Island
- Richard Thomas
- Right to Be Forgotten
- Right to Privacy
- Risk-Based Approach
- Rosemary Jay
- Russia
- Safe Harbor
- Sanctions
- Schrems
- Scott Kimpel
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- Security Rule
- Senate
- Serbia
- Service Provider
- Singapore
- Smart Grid
- Smart Metering
- Social Media
- Social Security Number
- South Africa
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- South Korea
- Spain
- Spyware
- Standard Contractual Clauses
- State Attorneys General
- Steven Haas
- Stick With Security Series
- Stored Communications Act
- Student Data
- Supreme Court
- Surveillance
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Targeted Advertising
- Telecommunications
- Telemarketing
- Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- Tennessee
- Terry McAuliffe
- Texas
- Text Message
- Thailand
- Transparency
- Transportation Security Administration
- Trump Administration
- United Arab Emirates
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Unmanned Aircraft Systems
- Uruguay
- Utah
- Vermont
- Video Privacy Protection Act
- Video Surveillance
- Virginia
- Viviane Reding
- Washington
- Whistleblowing
- Wireless Network
- Wiretap
- ZIP Code