On January 20, 2026, the European Commission proposed a comprehensive new cybersecurity package aimed at strengthening the EU’s cybersecurity resilience and enhancing its capacity to manage evolving threats. The cybersecurity package proposes revisions to the EU Cybersecurity Act, the EU Directive on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the European Union (the “NIS2 Directive”), and the European Cybersecurity Certification Framework (the “ECCF”).
The proposed revisions to the Cybersecurity Act will introduce four key elements:
- ICT Supply Chain Security Framework: A comprehensive framework shall be established to address information and communication technologies (“ICT”) supply chain security challenges in critical infrastructure.
- Enhanced Cybersecurity Certification: The European cybersecurity certification framework will be streamlined and improved to increase efficiency and better respond to market needs.
- Administrative Simplification: New measures will be introduced to reduce administrative requirements deemed unnecessary burdens associated with implementing the NIS2 Directive.
- Reinforcement of ENISA’s Role: The European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (“ENISA”) will be strengthened. EU Member States will be required to support this enhancement by appointing two liaison officers each.
Amendments to the NIS2 Directive proposed by the European Commission include:
- Clarified Scope and Definitions: Amendments will clarify the scope for certain sectors and entities, including healthcare, electricity, hydrogen and chemical providers, and will set clear rules for electricity producers with more than 1 MW of generation capacity.
- New Entity Categories: Small mid-cap enterprises will be designated as important entities, lowering compliance and supervisory burdens. Micro and small-sized Domain Name System service providers will be excluded from the scope.
- Streamlined Risk Management: Maximum harmonisation for cybersecurity risk-management measures and incident reporting will be introduced, supported by European certification schemes to facilitate cross-border compliance.
- Digital Identity & Wallets: Providers of European Digital Identity and Business Wallets will be classified as essential entities and will be subject to cybersecurity obligations regardless of size.
- Supply Chain Security: The Commission will develop guidelines to harmonize and simplify information requests for supply chain security, reducing duplicative administrative burdens.
- Ransomware Reporting: Rules for reporting information regarding ransomware attacks will be introduced. In the event of a ransomware attack, certain entities will be required to report sensitive information (such as whether the entity has paid a ransom and, if so, what amount and to whom) to computer security incident response teams (“CSIRTs”) and national authorities. The intention is to enable CSIRTs and national authorities to, amongst other things, compile the intelligence and evidence that law enforcement agencies need to disrupt and dismantle ransomware gangs and sanction their operatives.
- Enhanced Cross-Border Supervision: ENISA will support risk analysis and joint supervisory actions for essential and important entities operating across multiple Member States.
The updated ECCF will feature three main changes:
- Expanded and Clarified Scope: The ECCF will be broadened for greater legal certainty and market relevance. Entities will be able to certify ICT products, services, managed security services and their overall cyber posture, supporting compliance and presumed conformity with NIS2 and other EU laws.
- Defined Timelines and Improved Governance: The ECCF will introduce clear deadlines and deliverables, supported by a more efficient and effective governance model. ENISA, as the scheme manager, will be responsible for maintaining certification schemes and must develop candidate schemes within one year of a European Commission request, as a general rule.
- Harmonized Compliance Tools: Certification schemes will serve as practical compliance tools for businesses, fully aligned with existing EU cybersecurity legislation.
The package is to be presented to the European Parliament and European Council for approval. Once approved, the revised Cybersecurity Act will be applicable immediately, and Member States will have one year to transpose the updated NIS2 Directive into national law.
Read the press release here. Read the revised Cybersecurity Act here. Read the proposed NIS2 amendments here.
Search
Recent Posts
Categories
- Behavioral Advertising
- Centre for Information Policy Leadership
- Children’s Privacy
- Cyber Insurance
- Cybersecurity
- Enforcement
- European Union
- Events
- FCRA
- Financial Privacy
- General
- Health Privacy
- Identity Theft
- Information Security
- International
- Marketing
- Multimedia Resources
- Online Privacy
- Security Breach
- U.S. Federal Law
- U.S. State Law
- Workplace Privacy
Tags
- Aaron Simpson
- Accountability
- Adequacy
- Advertisement
- Advertising
- Age Appropriate Design Code
- Age Verification
- American Privacy Rights Act
- Anna Pateraki
- Anonymization
- Anti-terrorism
- APEC
- Apple Inc.
- Argentina
- Arkansas
- Article 29 Working Party
- Artificial Intelligence
- Attorney General
- Audit
- Australia
- Austria
- Automated Decisionmaking
- Baltimore
- Bankruptcy
- Belgium
- Biden Administration
- Big Data
- Binding Corporate Rules
- Biometric Data
- Blockchain
- Bojana Bellamy
- Brazil
- Brexit
- British Columbia
- Brittany Bacon
- Brussels
- Business Associate Agreement
- BYOD
- California
- CAN-SPAM
- Canada
- Cayman Islands
- CCPA
- CCTV
- Chile
- China
- Chinese Taipei
- Christopher Graham
- CIPA
- Class Action
- Clinical Trial
- Cloud
- Cloud Computing
- CNIL
- Colombia
- Colorado
- Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Compliance
- Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
- Congress
- Connecticut
- Consent
- Consent Order
- Consumer Protection
- Consumer Rights
- Cookies
- COPPA
- Coronavirus/COVID-19
- Council of Europe
- Council of the European Union
- Court of Justice of the European Union
- CPPA
- CPRA
- Credit Monitoring
- Credit Report
- Criminal Law
- Critical Infrastructure
- Croatia
- Cross-Border Data Flow
- Cross-Border Data Transfer
- Cyber Attack
- Cybersecurity
- Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
- Data Breach
- Data Brokers
- Data Controller
- Data Localization
- Data Privacy Framework
- Data Processor
- Data Protection Act
- Data Protection Authority
- Data Protection Impact Assessment
- Data Protection Officer
- Data Security
- Data Transfer
- David Dumont
- David Vladeck
- Deceptive Trade Practices
- Delaware
- Denmark
- Department of Commerce
- Department of Defense
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Department of Homeland Security
- Department of Justice
- Department of the Treasury
- Design
- Digital Markets Act
- District of Columbia
- Do Not Call
- Do Not Track
- Dobbs
- Dodd-Frank Act
- DORA
- DPIA
- E-Privacy
- E-Privacy Directive
- Ecuador
- Ed Tech
- Edith Ramirez
- Electronic Communications Privacy Act
- Electronic Privacy Information Center
- Electronic Protected Health Information
- Elizabeth Denham
- Employee Monitoring
- Encryption
- ENISA
- EU Data Protection Directive
- EU Member States
- European Commission
- European Data Protection Board
- European Data Protection Supervisor
- European Parliament
- Facial Recognition Technology
- FACTA
- Fair Credit Reporting Act
- Fair Information Practice Principles
- Federal Aviation Administration
- Federal Bureau of Investigation
- Federal Communications Commission
- Federal Data Protection Act
- Federal Trade Commission
- FERC
- Financial Data
- FinTech
- Florida
- Food and Drug Administration
- Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
- France
- Franchise
- Fred Cate
- Freedom of Information Act
- Freedom of Speech
- Fundamental Rights
- GDPR
- Geofencing
- Geolocation
- Geolocation Data
- Georgia
- Germany
- Global Privacy Assembly
- Global Privacy Enforcement Network
- Gramm Leach Bliley Act
- Hacker
- Hawaii
- Health Data
- HIPAA
- HITECH Act
- Hong Kong
- House of Representatives
- Hungary
- Illinois
- India
- Indiana
- Indonesia
- Information Commissioners Office
- Information Sharing
- Insurance Provider
- Internal Revenue Service
- International Association of Privacy Professionals
- International Commissioners Office
- Internet
- Internet of Things
- Iowa
- IP Address
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Jacob Kohnstamm
- Japan
- Jason Beach
- Jay Rockefeller
- Jenna Rode
- Jennifer Stoddart
- Jersey
- Jessica Rich
- John Delionado
- John Edwards
- Kentucky
- Korea
- Large Language Model
- Latin America
- Laura Leonard
- Law Enforcement
- Lawrence Strickling
- Legislation
- Liability
- Lisa Sotto
- Litigation
- Location-Based Services
- London
- Louisiana
- Madrid Resolution
- Maine
- Malaysia
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Meta
- Mexico
- Michigan
- Microsoft
- Minnesota
- Missouri
- Mobile
- Mobile App
- Mobile Device
- Montana
- Morocco
- MySpace
- Natascha Gerlach
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- National Labor Relations Board
- National Science and Technology Council
- National Security
- National Security Agency
- National Telecommunications and Information Administration
- Nebraska
- NEDPA
- Netherlands
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New Zealand
- Nigeria
- Ninth Circuit
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- North Korea
- Norway
- Obama Administration
- OCPA
- OECD
- Office for Civil Rights
- Office of Foreign Assets Control
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Online Behavioral Advertising
- Online Privacy
- Opt-In Consent
- Opt-Out
- Oregon
- Outsourcing
- Pakistan
- Parental Consent
- Payment Card
- PCI DSS
- Penalty
- Pennsylvania
- Personal Data
- Personal Health Information
- Personal Information
- Personally Identifiable Information
- Peru
- Philippines
- Poland
- PRISM
- Privacy
- Privacy By Design
- Privacy Notice
- Privacy Policy
- Privacy Rights
- Privacy Rule
- Privacy Shield
- Profiling
- Protected Health Information
- Ransomware
- Record Retention
- Red Flags Rule
- Rhode Island
- Richard Thomas
- Right to Be Forgotten
- Right to Privacy
- Risk Assessment
- Risk-Based Approach
- ROSCA
- Rosemary Jay
- Russia
- Safe Harbor
- Salesforce
- Sanctions
- Schrems
- Scott Kimpel
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- Security Rule
- Senate
- Sensitive Data
- Serbia
- Service Provider
- Singapore
- Smart Grid
- Smart Metering
- Social Media
- Social Security Number
- South Africa
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- South Korea
- Spain
- Spyware
- Standard Contractual Clauses
- State Attorneys General
- States Attorney General
- Steven Haas
- Stick With Security Series
- Stored Communications Act
- Student Data
- Supreme Court
- Surveillance
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Targeted Advertising
- Telecommunications
- Telemarketing
- Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- Tennessee
- Terry McAuliffe
- Texas
- Text Message
- Thailand
- Transparency
- Transportation Security Administration
- Trump Administration
- United Arab Emirates
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Unmanned Aircraft Systems
- Uruguay
- Utah
- Vermont
- Video Privacy Protection Act
- Video Surveillance
- Virginia
- Viviane Reding
- Washington
- Whistleblowing
- Wireless Network
- Wiretap
- ZIP Code