Arizona Becomes Fifth State with Class VI UIC Primacy
Time 2 Minute Read
Arizona Becomes Fifth State with Class VI UIC Primacy
Categories: Carbon, Climate, EPA

On September 10, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) authorized the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) to regulate all underground injection of carbon dioxide for long-term geological sequestration within Arizona’s jurisdiction. The final rule followed a comprehensive technical and legal review to ensure the state’s Underground Injection Control (UIC) program met all requirements under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) section 1422. As discussed in an earlier post, Arizona previously did not have primacy over any UIC well classes, unlike other states that have sought Class VI primacy thus far.

With this final rule, ADEQ will now regulate permitting, compliance, and enforcement for all six well classes in Arizona. EPA will retain oversight for wells on Indian lands, except for Class II wells on Navajo Nation lands, where primacy already exists.

This marks the fifth state with Class VI primacy, joining North Dakota (granted primacy in 2018), Wyoming (2020), Louisiana (2023), and West Virginia (2025). As we previously reported, EPA proposed to grant Class VI primacy to Texas in June and is expected to finalize that proposal in the near term.

Although there are no pending Class VI permit applications for projects in Arizona, Arizona is now better positioned to attract investments in CCS.


*Manasvini Venkatesh is not a lawyer.

  • Partner

    Alexandra focuses on environmental issues across media involving regulation, compliance, enforcement and litigation.

    Alexandra represents clients on matters arising under a wide range of federal environmental laws. She ...

  • Partner

    Kerry has more than 15 years of wide-ranging experience handling novel and complex energy, environmental, and administrative law issues. She is particularly knowledgeable regarding the Clean Water Act (CWA), Safe Drinking Water ...

  • Partner

    As a former US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) attorney, Sam utilizes his agency, regulatory, enforcement, and practical experience to help his clients navigate environmental, energy, natural resource, sustainability ...

  • Partner

    Fred advocates for clients before Congress and federal agencies. Clients trust him for his insightful and practical know-how acquired from years spent as Counsel to the US House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 4 Minute Read

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) has finalized and released a new version of ISO 27914 (ISO 27914:2026), the standard for underground storage of carbon dioxide in geological formations that do not produce hydrocarbons. 

Time 1 Minute Read

The “prior converted cropland” exclusion exempts certain agricultural lands from Clean Water Act regulation. The 2025 “waters of the United States” proposed rule seeks to clarify and update this exclusion, making it easier for farmers to demonstrate that their prior converted cropland is not subject to the Clean Water Act. If finalized, the proposal could have significant benefits for agricultural producers nationwide.

Time 6 Minute Read

For the fourth time in the last ten years, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed to modify its Risk Management Program (RMP) regulations. EPA will hold a public hearing on the proposed modifications on March 10, 2026, and is accepting written public comment on the proposal through April 10, 2026.

Time 6 Minute Read

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) recently announced it is “exercising its enforcement discretion to no longer pursue criminal charges . . . on allegations of tampering with onboard diagnostic devices in motor vehicles” under the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). According to DOJ, this exercise of discretion not to criminally prosecute is based on “sound enforcement principles, efficient use of government resources[,] and avoiding overcriminalization of federal environmental law.” DOJ’s announcement is an about-face from years of criminal prosecutions for identical conduct, including an increase of these prosecutions under the first Trump administration. As a result of this new policy, DOJ is now dismissing existing CAA criminal tampering cases—more than a dozen prosecutions thus far—and the decision may impact some 20 or more ongoing investigations. DOJ stated in its announcement that it intends to continue to pursue civil enforcement for tampering cases under the Act in partnership with EPA.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page