EPA Determines Revisions to Federal Regulation of E&P Wastes Unwarranted
Time 4 Minute Read
EPA Determines Revisions to Federal Regulation of E&P Wastes Unwarranted
Categories: EPA, Oil & Gas, Water

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has recently determined that no revisions to existing RCRA Subtitle D regulations for the management of oil and gas wastes are necessary. This conclusion follows EPA’s completion of an extensive review to fulfill the requirements of a Consent Decree entered by the US District Court for the District of Columbia that settled litigation filed by certain environmental organizations over EPA’s alleged failure to update its rules for management of oil and gas wastes. EPA’s findings, released on April 23, 2019, are set forth in a report titled, Management of Oil and Gas Exploration, Development and Production Wastes: Factors Informing a Decision on the Need for Regulatory Action (Report). This means that, at least for now, EPA’s longstanding position on regulation of oil and gas wastes remains unchanged.

As background, in 1980, under the Bentsen Amendment, Congress exempted drilling fluids, produced waters and other wastes associated with the exploration, development and production of crude oil, natural gas or geothermal energy from regulation under RCRA Subtitle C, which regulates management of hazardous wastes. 42 U.S.C. § 6921(b)(2). Under this provision, EPA was required to determine whether regulation of these exempted wastes was warranted under the RCRA Subtitle C program and submit its findings to Congress for consideration. In 1987, EPA reported to Congress that it had concluded that RCRA Subtitle C hazardous waste cradle-to-grave regulation for oil and gas wastes was unwarranted.[1] EPA noted that, among other things, enforcement of existing state and federal programs (including those under RCRA Subtitle D, the Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act) would be generally adequate to control these wastes. The highly prescriptive RCRA Subtitle C program requirements were deemed insufficiently flexible to take into account the various differences in oil and gas sites across the country. In 1988, EPA issued its Regulatory Determination of Oil and Gas and Geothermal Exploration, Development and Production Wastes, setting forth its decision not to promulgate regulations under RCRA Subtitle C for oil and gas wastes. See 53 Fed. Reg. 25,446 (July 6, 1988).

As part of the reconsideration of its prior determination, EPA reviewed the content and elements of existing state regulatory frameworks for oil and gas wastes and, in particular, those 28 states accounting for the vast majority of oil and gas production in the US. EPA found that while current state programs are diverse, they include the key components of waste management programs such as requirements for secondary containment, liners for pits and groundwater monitoring. In addition, 24 of the states reviewed by EPA had recently revised their regulations for oil and gas wastes with some having done so within the last year, an indication that states are actively updating waste management programs to address emerging issues such as the adoption of hydraulic fracturing and directional drilling techniques associated with increased oil and gas operations. EPA also reviewed recently identified release incidents and found that such releases were relatively infrequent, addressed on site in most cases and largely the result of human error and noncompliance with state regulations. In view of the foregoing, EPA concluded that inspection and enforcement improvements at the state level would likely be more effective in addressing oil and gas waste incidents rather than the imposition of new federal requirements. However, EPA made clear that it would continue to work to identify areas for improvement in collaboration with states and other organizations. Developments are likely to continue to unfold with regard to this subject as environmental organizations have reportedly expressed their dissatisfaction with EPA’s conclusion and will likely continue to press for different results, whether at the federal or state levels.

 

[1] See Management of Wastes from the Exploration, Development, and Production of Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Geothermal Energy (December 28, 1987).

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 4 Minute Read

On January 15, 2021, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (“TCEQ”) received approval to implement the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) program for oil and gas discharges. [1]  Generally, as a result of this approval, applicants for NPDES permits for produced water, hydrostatic test water, and gas plant effluent will only require a single TCEQ authorization rather than authorizations from both the Railroad Commission of Texas (“RRC”) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as previously had been required. [2]

Time 4 Minute Read

On November 27, 2020, the US Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) published notice that the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (“TCEQ”) has applied to the US EPA for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) program authorization for discharges of produced water, hydrostatic test water and gas plant effluent. [1] TCEQ’s application (“Application”) was filed in response to a bill passed during the last Texas legislative session that required TCEQ to submit to EPA no later than September 1, 2021, a request for NPDES permitting authority for discharges of produced water, hydrostatic test water and gas plant effluent associated with oil and gas activities currently under the jurisdiction of the Railroad Commission of Texas (RRC). [2] Under this legislation, state authority to regulate these discharges will transfer from the RRC to TCEQ upon EPA’s grant of NPDES permitting authority to TCEQ. Should EPA grant NPDES permitting authority to TCEQ for these discharges, a prospective permittee would generally only need to obtain a single TCEQ authorization (rather than an authorization from both the RRC and EPA). [3]

Time 2 Minute Read

Last week, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) issued its final report addressing the input received by various stakeholders relating to the management of wastewater from the oil and gas industry.  The report entitled Summary of Input on Oil and Gas Extraction Wastewater Management Practices Under the Clean Water Act is the culmination of a stakeholder engagement process that began in 2018 (“Final Report”) [1].

Time 5 Minute Read

On February 13, 2020, a Texas federal court granted summary judgment in favor of coverage, finding the policyholder provided sufficient notice to its insurer of a potential claim for damages caused by allegedly contaminated proppant used at a well site in west Texas.  See Evanston Insurance Company v. OPF Enterprises, LLC, Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-2048 (S.D.T.X. Feb. 13, 2020) (Dkt. No. 51) .  The Court found that the policyholder’s notice of a potential claim was effective when provided to the insurer’s agent, even though it was not provided directly to the insurer itself.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page