EPA Publishes 2021 TRI Preliminary Dataset and Plans to Remove De Minimis TRI Reporting Exemption for PFAS
Time 3 Minute Read
EPA Publishes 2021 TRI Preliminary Dataset and Plans to Remove De Minimis TRI Reporting Exemption for PFAS
Categories: Chemicals, EPA, PFAS, Policy

On July 28, 2022, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)  published the 2021 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) preliminary dataset that provides public access to data about chemical releases, waste management, and pollution prevention activities that took place in calendar year 2021 at more than 20,000 federal and industrial facilities across the country. The 2021 preliminary dataset, which for the second year includes reporting on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) added to the TRI by the 2020 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), has not yet undergone the complete TRI data quality process. EPA plans to publish the quality-checked dataset in October 2022, at which time it will be the basis for the 2021 TRI National Analysis interpreting the information and examining trends that is expected to be published in early 2023. Companies should bear in mind that information collected under the TRI program can be used not only to inform regulatory action, but also as a basis for enforcement by EPA and citizen suits.

As part of EPA’s announcement of the 2021 preliminary dataset, EPA reaffirmed its intention to proceed with plans to enhance PFAS reporting under the TRI program in the fall of this year, a move that has also been pushed for by environmental groups. [1] Specifically, as we have previously reported, EPA plans to initiate rulemaking to eliminate the use of the de minimis exemption under the Supplier Notification Requirements for facilities that manufacture or process PFAS and chemicals included on the Chemicals of Special Concern list. [2] Plans for this rulemaking were also set forth in EPA’s PFAS Strategic Roadmap with EPA stating that “certain exemptions …significantly limited the amount of data that EPA received for [PFAS] in the first year of reporting.” In this most recent announcement, EPA notes that “[b]ecause PFAS are used at low concentrations in many products, the elimination of the de minimis exemption would result in a more complete picture of the releases and other waste quantities for these chemicals.” If EPA’s planned removal of the de minimis exemption is finalized, TRI reporting burdens are expected to increase and companies that have not been previously required to report may face new reporting obligations and compliance challenges.


[1] On January 20, 2022, the National PFAS Contamination Coalition, Sierra Club and Union of Concerned Scientists filed a lawsuit alleging, among other things, that EPA inappropriately applied the de minimis exemption to the PFAS added to the TRI by the 2020 NDAA.  See Complaint, National PFAS Contamination Coalition et al. v. EPA, No. 1:22-cv-00132 (D.D.C. filed on Jan. 20, 2022).  The litigation is currently stayed through September 30, 2022.

[2] See 40 CFR §372.28 Notably, Chemicals of Special Concern include dioxin and dioxin-like compounds as well as lead and mercury and lead and mercury compounds.

  • Counsel

    Javaneh draws on her broad in-house and private practice experience to counsel clients on chemical and environmental regulatory and compliance matters. She assists clients with regulatory compliance, advocacy before federal ...

  • Partner

    Accomplished in the area of chemicals regulation, Greg guides clients through the complexities of regulatory, compliance, litigation, enforcement, and transactional matters. His environmental law leadership spans key ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 10 Minute Read

On April 29, 2025, EPA Region 6 entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the Texas Railroad Commission (RRC) that outlines the state’s plans for administering its Class VI injection well program related to carbon capture, utilization, and sequestration. The MOA delineates the responsibility of authority for administering all Class VI injection well activities and regulation in the State of Texas. The signing of the MOA is a significant step towards RRC’s primacy over its Class VI injection well program and represents the end of the application phase of RRC’s primacy effort and the beginning of the proposed rulemaking phase.

Time 4 Minute Read

On April 28, 2025, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin revealed the agency’s strategic plans across program offices to address per- and-polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), commonly known as “forever chemicals.” This marks the first public announcement from the new Trump Administration on this issue. EPA aims to implement comprehensive actions targeting PFAS in areas such as water, air emissions, land, waste, and manufactured and imported products. Although specific details are still pending, the announcement foreshadows potential regulatory and enforcement actions the agency may prioritize in the coming months, guided by principles of strengthening scientific research, fulfilling legal obligations, enhancing communication, and building partnerships.

Time 5 Minute Read

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) (jointly, “the Agencies”) recently issued guidance addressing implementation of the definition of “waters of the U.S.” (WOTUS). The guidance specifically provides direction on the proper implementation of “continuous surface connection” as it relates to adjacent wetlands.

Time 4 Minute Read

EPA’s plans to investigate – and eventually establish limits on and liability for – PFAS in wastewater discharges and biosolids crossed a significant milestone on January 31, 2024, with the completion of two new analytical methods to detect these ubiquitous contaminants. The most significant of the two is Method 1633, which provides a standardized quantitative method for laboratories to detect 40 different PFAS compounds, at very low levels, in wastewater, surface water, groundwater, soil, biosolids, sediment, landfill leachate, and fish tissue. Method 1621 is a low-cost screening method for the presence of fluorine-containing organic compounds, which could lead to use of the more sensitive Method 1633 to further characterize any PFAS in the sample. EPA’s public statements provide no timeline for seeking approval of these methods for PFAS monitoring of wastewater discharges as part of 40 C.F.R. Part 136, but a Method Update Rule is likely to be proposed before the end of the year.

EPA has big plans for the PFAS data that these two new methods will generate.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page