FERC to Sunset Regulations Pursuant to Executive Order
Time 3 Minute Read
FERC to Sunset Regulations Pursuant to Executive Order

On October 1, 2025, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued a direct final rule (Order No. 913) inserting a conditional sunset date into certain of its regulations in response to Executive Order 14270, “Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting to Unleash American Energy.”

Order No. 913

  • E.O. 14270 directed FERC to insert a sunset date into certain regulations in effect as of the date of the E.O. and that were issued, in whole or in part, pursuant to the Federal Power Act, the Natural Gas Act, and the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978.
  • FERC determined that a regulation was ripe for sunsetting if it did not fit into one or more of the following three categories: (1) regulations that cannot be sunset “consistent with applicable law” because they are necessary to fulfill the Commission’s statutory mandates to ensure reliable, safe, secure, and economically efficient energy for consumers at a reasonable cost; (2) regulations that are part of the Commission’s “regulatory permitting regimes authorized by statute;” or (3) regulations that implement statutes other than the three specific statutes identified in the E.O.
  • FERC identified 53 regulations that will sunset one year after Order No. 913’s effective date, which is 45 days after publication of the rule in the Federal Register. In general the regulations were all duplicative, outdated (e.g., regulations governing paper filings which are no longer accepted after FERC moved to electronic filing years ago), or otherwise inconsequential.
  • FERC also issued a companion notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) inviting public comments on the costs and benefits of the regulations referenced in Order No. 913.

Implications

  • FERC’s approach is much narrower than many had anticipated.
  • Order No. 913 omitted all of the “major” FERC regulations, including those issued under Order Nos. 679, 888, 1000, 2000, and 2023, all of which were reportedly listed as candidates for sunsetting in a draft notice of inquiry that was never publicly released. The substantive impact is thus much lower than it could have been given that each of the 53 regulations slated to sunset are comparatively minor.
  • It remains to be seen whether parties will file comments in the NOPR docket arguing that FERC should sunset more of its regulations and challenging FERC’s determination that such regulations could not be sunset “consistent with applicable law.”
  • At a more general level, the E.O. and Order No. 913 are significant because they highlight the changing relationship between the Executive and FERC, which has traditionally functioned as an “independent agency” not subject to direct presidential control. Although the Commission attempts to walk a line between acknowledging that Order No. 913’s promulgation is attributable to “[t]he President [directing] the Commission to issue a zero-based regulating rule” while maintaining its independent policy prerogative by concluding that it “has further determined, based on its independent policy judgment” that sunsetting certain regulations is appropriate, Order No. 913 at PP 9-10, it is notable as another of several recent examples of the Commission unanimously deciding to initiate regulatory action at the behest of an executive directive.

A copy of Order No. 913 is available here.

  • Partner

    Ted focuses his practice on federal energy regulation, particularly FERC regulation of electricity and natural gas transmission, markets, and transactions. He also counsels on FERC and NERC reliability issues, advising clients ...

  • Partner

    Marty is a natural resources and project development attorney who helps clients with property transactions, rezonings, and permitting throughout the US, including defense of permits that are challenged in court. He develops land ...

  • Associate

    Nate focuses his practice at the intersection of environmental and energy law. Prior to joining Hunton, Nate served as legal advisor to a Commissioner on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) where he provided counsel on ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 5 Minute Read

Perhaps the biggest EPR news to date is the February 6, 2026 decision by the US District Court for the District of Oregon granting the National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors Inc. (NAW) a preliminary injunction to block enforcement of Oregon’s Plastic Pollution and Recycling Modernization Act (RMA) pending a decision on the merits.[1] The Oregon litigation has the potential to affect the scope of EPR programs across the country, potentially extending beyond packaging to other products. In the meantime, product manufacturers and retailers must continue to wrestle with how best to manage EPR compliance and related costs and business impacts.

Time 6 Minute Read

On November 21, the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service published four proposed rules to amend the Endangered Species Act implementing regulations. Generally, the Services propose to reinstate language from the first Trump Administration’s 2019 regulations in provisions concerning interagency section 7 consultation, criteria for listing species and designating critical habitat, protections for threatened species, and exclusions from critical habitat designation.

Time 9 Minute Read

On November 20, 2025, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of the Army issued a notice of a proposed rulemaking to update the definition of “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act for consistency with the US Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency and to clarify key terms for implementation.

Time 8 Minute Read

On October 23, 2025, the Secretary of Energy, pursuant to his authority under section 403 of the Department of Energy Organization Act, directed the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to initiate rulemaking procedures and consider an advance notice of proposed rulemaking that sets forth potential reforms to expedite and facilitate the interconnection of “large loads,” notably data centers, to the interstate transmission system.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page