ISO Publishes New Standard for Carbon Storage With Potential as Subpart RR Substitute
Time 4 Minute Read
ISO Publishes New Standard for Carbon Storage With Potential as Subpart RR Substitute
Categories: Carbon

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) has finalized and released a new version of ISO 27914 (ISO 27914:2026), the standard for underground storage of carbon dioxide in geological formations that do not produce hydrocarbons. 

This standard is of particular significance because it could provide an alternative mechanism enabling the carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) industry to claim Section 45Q carbon sequestration tax credits if the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalizes its proposal from last fall to repeal the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). This would include Subpart RR of the GHGRP, reporting under which is currently required for certain carbon sequestration operations under Department of Treasury regulations for the Section 45Q carbon sequestration tax credit.

Currently, Subpart RR of the GHGRP must be used by Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program Class VI storage operators as part of demonstrating “secure geological storage” of carbon oxides to qualify for the 45Q tax credit. Subpart RR is the only reporting mechanism authorized under the Treasury regulations for reporting for Class VI storage operations. Thus, the concern has been that, if Subpart RR is eliminated, taxpayers would not be able to claim the Section 45Q tax credit for permanent sequestration unless an alternative standard is adopted.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) last December issued a “safe harbor” notice (IRS Notice 2026-1) stating that, if by June 10, 2026, EPA did not open the electronic Greenhouse Gas Reporting Tool (e-GGRT) – the system it provides for entities to report the quantities of carbon oxides securely geologically sequestered under Subpart RR – then taxpayers could continue to follow the requirements of Subpart RR to claim the Section 45Q credit for the 2025 calendar year, as long as they obtain verification from an independent third-party engineer or geologist that the capture and disposal is in compliance with Subpart RR as in effect on December 31, 2025, and the information is accurate and complete. The independent engineer or geologist must include an affidavit that he or she is independent from the taxpayer. This essentially is “Subpart RR by another name.” However, the safe harbor provided in IRS Notice 2026-1 is applicable only for the 2025 calendar year, so Treasury and the IRS will need to issue additional guidance for future years, assuming Subpart RR is repealed.   

Another key option for replacing Subpart RR could be ISO 27914. This standard has been in existence for a number of years, but the version of the standard in place until now – ISO 27914:2017 – lacked the detailed requirements for storage calculation, as well as monitoring, reporting, and verification, that would be needed for it to function as a substitute for Subpart RR. The new version – ISO 27914:2026 – addresses those gaps. 

Should the IRS or Treasury decide to adopt ISO 27914:2026 by guidance or regulation as a replacement for Subpart RR, it would need to specify the portions of the standard that would serve in place of Subpart RR. ISO 27914:2026 reads much like a combination of Class VI UIC storage regulations, plus Subpart RR. The standard addresses issues associated with Class VI, such as site screening, feasibility investigation, and characterization; well construction; storage operations; risk management; and closure. It also covers issues addressed under Subpart RR, including quantification, and monitoring, reporting, and verification requirements. 

There is significant commonality between Subpart RR and the “RR-like” sections of ISO 27914:2026. The following sampling of similar provisions, while not a comprehensive list, illustrates the similarities: 

 

Subpart RR

ISO 29714:2026

Storage Unit Characterization



Delineate maximum and active monitoring areas and identify potential surface leakage pathways


Identify extent of storage unit and area of review, including establishment of boundaries and identification and characterization of fault zones and structural features affecting containment

CO2 Stream Concentration

Quarterly sampling to determine CO2 stream concentration


Characterize CO2 stream sufficiently to allow quantification of mass injected

Sequestered Quantity


Sequestered quantity = mass of CO2 injected – amounts emitted from surface leakage, and emitted from equipment and venting

Mass stored = mass input – mass lost in operations and loss from the storage complex


In the United States, ISO 27914:2026 now will be reviewed for approval by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). As a practical matter, should the IRS and Treasury consider approving ISO 27914:2026 as a Subpart RR substitute, they may decide to wait until after ANSI has approved the standard. That would be consistent with Treasury’s approval for use of a different ISO standard – ISO 27916:2019 – for enhanced oil recovery operations, which was finalized after ANSI had approved ISO 27916:2019. As with the current safe harbor for Section 45Q reporting for the 2025 calendar year, in the case of ISO 27916:2019, Treasury required certification of reported quantities by an independent engineer or geologist, which also likely would be the case if ISO 27914:2026 becomes an approved reporting alternative.

  • Partner

    Fred advocates for clients before Congress and federal agencies. Clients trust him for his insightful and practical know-how acquired from years spent as Counsel to the US House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee ...

  • Partner

    Alexandra focuses on environmental issues across media involving regulation, compliance, enforcement and litigation.

    Alexandra represents clients on matters arising under a wide range of federal environmental laws. She ...

  • Senior Attorney

    James focuses his practice on federal income tax law, with an emphasis on renewable energy deals. He advises clients on matters related to energy and renewable energy tax credits. His experience includes transactions involving ...

  • Associate

    As an associate in the firm’s environmental practice group, Sadie counsels clients on a broad range of issues, such as sustainability, supply chain management, and natural resources. Her experience includes research and ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 7 Minute Read

For companies assessing their compliance obligations under California’s climate disclosure laws, the whirlwind of legal developments, shifting implementation guidance from the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and uncertainty about the laws’ applicability and substantive compliance obligations continues to present challenges.

Time 3 Minute Read

On Friday, October 10, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) posted for public comment a draft template for reporting Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions pursuant to California SB 253, the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (Act). Along with the draft template, CARB also posted an explanatory memorandum.

Time 2 Minute Read

On September 10, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) authorized the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) to regulate all underground injection of carbon dioxide for long-term geological sequestration within Arizona’s jurisdiction. The final rule followed a comprehensive technical and legal review to ensure the state’s Underground Injection Control (UIC) program met all requirements under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) section 1422. As discussed in an earlier post, Arizona previously did not have primacy over any UIC well classes, unlike other states that have sought Class VI primacy thus far.

Time 4 Minute Read

Last month saw several developments in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) ongoing efforts to authorize states to implement Class VI of the federal Underground Injection Control (UIC) program under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) for geologic sequestration of carbon. This push toward state primacy is an important development for the rapidly growing carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) industry, for which Class VI permits are the critical construction and operating permit. Currently, there are 62 CCS projects - including many with multiple wells - with permit applications pending with EPA. Project proponents anticipate that permitting will be faster if administered by the state instead of EPA. The latest developments last month include: (1) EPA’s proposal to grant primacy to Arizona; (2) EPA’s proposal to grant primacy to Texas; (3) a federal court decision rejecting a challenge to EPA’s earlier grant of primacy to Louisiana; and (4) an ongoing challenge to West Virginia’s recently granted primacy.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page