Preparing for Increased Focus on Environmental Justice in Project Permitting
Time 1 Minute Read
Preparing for Increased Focus on Environmental Justice in Project Permitting
Categories: General

In this article, the authors discuss the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) and environmental justice review requirements for federal agency actions, recent challenges and court decisions showcasing the increased scrutiny and focus on environmental justice reviews for project permitting, recent NEPA regulation and other environmental justice developments, and what the recent cases and other recent regulatory and political developments may mean for project permitting and environmental justice.

To read the full version of this article, originally published in Pratt's October 2020 Energy Law Report (Vol.20-9) please download a PDF version of the article here. To learn more about the authors please visit our website here: Kerry McGrath and Alexandra Hamilton.

  • Partner

    Alexandra focuses on environmental issues across media involving regulation, compliance, enforcement and litigation.

    Alexandra represents clients on matters arising under a wide range of federal environmental laws. She ...

  • Partner

    Kerry has more than 15 years of wide-ranging experience handling novel and complex energy, environmental, and administrative law issues. She is particularly knowledgeable regarding the Clean Water Act (CWA), Safe Drinking Water ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 7 Minute Read

The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and its sub-agency, the US Forest Service (USFS), have taken two significant steps to modernize the regulatory framework governing hard rock mining on National Forest System (NFS) lands. USFS has proposed an overhaul of its locatable mineral regulations, while USDA has finalized updates to its NEPA implementing procedures, together reshaping how mining operations are planned, permitted, and reviewed on federal forest lands. Operators should take note of both.

Time 6 Minute Read

In recent years, there have been major shifts involving the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and its implementing regulations as a result of statutory amendments, court decisions, and the Trump Administration’s efforts to streamline federal permitting. For decades, NEPA’s sparse statutory language provided few specifics on NEPA implementation, and the regulatory framework was based on implementing regulations promulgated by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) and judicial precedent interpreting those regulations. As a result of its requirements and challenges questioning agency compliance with those requirements, critical projects were slowed or abandoned due to NEPA review timeframes and the threat of litigation from project opponents.

Time 3 Minute Read

On September 29, 2025, the White House Council on Environmental Quality issued key guidance to federal agencies on implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act.

Time 6 Minute Read

On May 29, 2025, in a decision long-awaited by project developers, the Supreme Court issued Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado, which clarified the proper scope of review and deference to be afforded to agency decisionmaking under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This decision reinforces longstanding Supreme Court holdings and may help improve the NEPA process by providing support for agencies to focus their NEPA reviews on impacts associated with their authorizations.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page