Susan Parker Bodine Nominated to Head EPA’s National Enforcement Office
Time 3 Minute Read
Categories: EPA

President Trump recently nominated Susan Parker Bodine to lead the Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (“OECA”).  OECA is responsible for coordinating the enforcement of federal environmental laws under EPA’s authority.  OECA acts through a combination of compliance assistance, administrative enforcement and, in partnership with the US Department of Justice, civil and criminal enforcement.

If confirmed as OECA’s assistant administrator, Bodine would bring substantial experience to the office.  She has nearly three decades of experience in environmental law.  Bodine currently serves as chief counsel for the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, where she oversaw the recent overhaul of the Toxic Substances Control Act.  Prior to that, Bodine was in private practice at a law firm in Washington, D.C.  She previously spent time as staff director of the House of Representatives Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment, and was assistant administrator of EPA’s Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response—since renamed the Office of Land and Emergency Management in 2015—during President George W. Bush’s administration.

While Bodine’s diverse experience indicates deep familiarity with OECA and its mission, it is too early to tell what her tenure at OECA would look like, if confirmed.  For example, at one point in early 2017, the Trump Administration was reportedly exploring the option of eliminating OECA and sending responsibility for enforcement back to the media-specific offices (e.g., the Office of Air and Radiation would be responsible for nationwide air enforcement).  Regardless of the status of that effort, the Trump Administration has announced its aim to re-focus EPA’s enforcement efforts on programs not delegated to the states.  With a refocused role for OECA, the next assistant administrator may also choose to revisit the national enforcement initiatives selected by the prior administration in 2016 and reevaluate EPA’s Next Generation Compliance strategies, which were a significant initiative pursued by the office during the prior administration.

Furthermore, there is uncertainty about OECA’s budget in fiscal year 2018 and beyond.  As we noted in a previous post, President Trump’s budget “blueprint” for the 2018 fiscal year (which outlines the White House’s fiscal priorities) would sharply decrease EPA enforcement by cutting OECA’s budget by $129 million from the previous year’s levels—a roughly 23% decrease.  Congress’ recent spending measure to fund the government through 2017, however, declined to cut EPA’s enforcement budget, and instead left OECA’s funding levels from the previous year largely intact.  If confirmed, Bodine will play a large role in developing OECA’s budget for fiscal year 2018, which will provide more evidence of her goals and priorities in leading OECA.

  • Partner

    Alexandra focuses on environmental issues across media involving regulation, compliance, enforcement and litigation.

    Alexandra represents clients on matters arising under a wide range of federal environmental laws. She ...

  • Counsel

    Todd advises companies and executives nationwide when environmental, regulatory, or enforcement issues suddenly place operations, leadership, or reputation under scrutiny, and early decisions carry outsized risk. He is ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 1 Minute Read

The California Consumer Privacy Act continues to drive significant enforcement activity—particularly when minors’ data is involved. In a recent action, the California Privacy Protection Agency imposed a $1.1 million fine on youth sports platform PlayOn Sports for alleged violations involving student data and inadequate opt-out mechanisms. The case highlights growing regulatory scrutiny around how companies collect, share, and provide transparency about personal information—especially when schools and students are involved. 

Time 1 Minute Read

On February 6, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission announced its second report to Congress on its efforts to combat ransomware and other cyber attacks.

Time 9 Minute Read

Since its first day in office, the current administration has taken steps to curtail the development of renewable energy, and wind energy in particular. Just over a year in, the administration’s intentions do not seem to have changed, but there are signs that legal challenges are affecting implementation of its policies toward renewable energy development.

Time 5 Minute Read

Perhaps the biggest EPR news to date is the February 6, 2026 decision by the US District Court for the District of Oregon granting the National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors Inc. (NAW) a preliminary injunction to block enforcement of Oregon’s Plastic Pollution and Recycling Modernization Act (RMA) pending a decision on the merits.[1] The Oregon litigation has the potential to affect the scope of EPR programs across the country, potentially extending beyond packaging to other products. In the meantime, product manufacturers and retailers must continue to wrestle with how best to manage EPR compliance and related costs and business impacts.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page