The Home Stretch: Recent Regulatory Agendas Show Administration’s Efforts to Make Progress on Delayed Agency Actions on PFAS and TSCA Chemicals
Time 3 Minute Read
The Home Stretch: Recent Regulatory Agendas Show Administration’s Efforts to Make Progress on Delayed Agency Actions on PFAS and TSCA Chemicals
Categories: Chemicals, EPA, PFAS

In December 2023, federal agencies released their “Fall 2023” Regulatory Agendas that provide an outlook for numerous upcoming regulatory actions on chemicals that could have significant implications for the regulated community. Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP’s chemical regulatory team has provided analyses of these upcoming regulatory actions:

PFAS

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and US Department of Defense (DoD) released their Fall 2023 Unified Agendas of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions detailing upcoming rulemakings, including actions related to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). These agencies are initiating PFAS-related regulatory actions that will pose new compliance challenges with far-reaching implications for a broad spectrum of the regulated community and affected stakeholders. Among these regulatory items are:

  • EPA’s final national primary drinking water regulation (NPDWR) for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS), and hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid (HFPO–DA) and its ammonium salt (also known as a GenX chemicals)
  • EPA’s final rule designating PFOA and PFOS as CERCLA hazardous substances
  • EPA’s proposed listing of PFOA, PFOS, PFBS, and GenX as RCRA hazardous constituents
  • DoD’s proposal to prohibit the Department from procuring certain products containing PFOA or PFOS

TSCA

EPA’s Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention (OCSPP) has released a robust agenda that continues to reflect the following priorities: advancing risk management regulations for several chemicals, clarifying procedures for new and existing chemical evaluations, data collection, addressing PFAS, and substantially increasing fees from companies regulated under TSCA. Among the TSCA-related regulatory items are:

  • EPA’s final risk management rules for five of the “first ten” chemicals
  • EPA’s proposed rule to request manufacturers of certain existing chemicals to submit unpublished health and safety data to help EPA identify chemicals for prioritization, among other uses
  • EPA’s revisions to its framework rules for reviews of new chemicals (including premanufacture notice reviews) and existing chemical risk evaluations
  • EPA’s proposed Significant New Use Rules (SNURs) for high-priority chemicals, including “phthalates,” “certain solvents,” and chemicals undergoing risk evaluation. These will follow EPA’s recent release of SNURs for flame retardants and PFAS substances that are on the “inactive portion” of the TSCA Inventory.
  • EPA’s additional proposed risk evaluations for the flame retardant Tris(2-chloroethyl) Phosphate  (TCEP) and other forthcoming chemicals

Please contact our team for more information.

  • Counsel

    Javaneh draws on her broad in-house and private practice experience to counsel clients on chemical and environmental regulatory and compliance matters. She assists clients with regulatory compliance, advocacy before federal ...

  • Senior Attorney

    Paul counsels clients on the impact of environmental law and policy, applying his in-depth knowledge as a PhD chemist to legal issues. Paul is an environmental law practitioner with more than 15 years of experience providing clients ...

  • Partner

    Accomplished in the area of chemicals regulation, Greg guides clients through the complexities of regulatory, compliance, litigation, enforcement, and transactional matters. His environmental law leadership spans key ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 4 Minute Read

On February 6, 2026, the US Environmental Protection Agency issued a press release highlighting significant actions addressing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) taken during the first year of the new administration and signaling continued expansion of efforts affecting regulated entities. The announcement reiterates EPA’s continued commitment to making PFAS a top priority across its programs. The release also summarizes EPA’s PFAS testing approach and methods for identifying and measuring PFAS in various environmental media, the results of which will guide the agency’s future actions. Overall, EPA expects to expand research and testing, increase community engagement, and strengthen enforcement actions to address PFAS contamination.

Time 5 Minute Read

Perhaps the biggest EPR news to date is the February 6, 2026 decision by the US District Court for the District of Oregon granting the National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors Inc. (NAW) a preliminary injunction to block enforcement of Oregon’s Plastic Pollution and Recycling Modernization Act (RMA) pending a decision on the merits.[1] The Oregon litigation has the potential to affect the scope of EPR programs across the country, potentially extending beyond packaging to other products. In the meantime, product manufacturers and retailers must continue to wrestle with how best to manage EPR compliance and related costs and business impacts.

Time 6 Minute Read

Chemical manufacturers, product makers, and product retailers are gearing up for new state-level restrictions on products sold in stores and online that contain per- and-polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). A total of 18 states have PFAS product restrictions ranging from bans to reporting to labeling requirements. The laws target primarily food packaging, cosmetics, cookware, and textiles, but some states have expansive laws that include all types of products. Each year for the past four years, approximately 200 PFAS-related bills are introduced in state legislatures, and we expect this trend to continue, potentially adding to the growing patchwork of PFAS restrictions.

Time 5 Minute Read

On November 10, 2025, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a pre-publication copy of its proposed rule to significantly reduce the scope of PFAS reporting under Section 8(a)(7) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Significantly, EPA’s proposal would exempt imported articles from reporting. Once the proposed rule is published in the Federal Register, it will be subject to a 45-day comment period.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page