The Shifting NEPA Landscape and Implications for Project Development
Time 1 Minute Read
The Shifting NEPA Landscape and Implications for Project Development
Categories: Natural Resources

A discussion of the National Environmental Policy Act and related regulations and their implications for project development.

Under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), federal agencies must determine if their proposed major federal actions (including permit authorizations for projects sponsored by private entities) will significantly affect the human environment and consider the environmental and related social and economic effects. This means that virtually any project that requires a federal permit or authorization may be required to undergo a NEPA review. Development of broadband infrastructure, roads, bridges, oil and gas pipelines, and renewable energy facilities are just a few examples of the types of activities that may trigger NEPA review.

To read the full version of this article, originally published by Practical Law, please download a PDF version of the article here or please visit the Practical Law website here

To learn more about the authors please visit our website here: Kerry McGrath.

  • Partner

    Kerry has more than 15 years of wide-ranging experience handling novel and complex energy, environmental, and administrative law issues. She is particularly knowledgeable regarding the Clean Water Act (CWA), Safe Drinking Water ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 7 Minute Read

The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and its sub-agency, the US Forest Service (USFS), have taken two significant steps to modernize the regulatory framework governing hard rock mining on National Forest System (NFS) lands. USFS has proposed an overhaul of its locatable mineral regulations, while USDA has finalized updates to its NEPA implementing procedures, together reshaping how mining operations are planned, permitted, and reviewed on federal forest lands. Operators should take note of both.

Time 6 Minute Read

In recent years, there have been major shifts involving the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and its implementing regulations as a result of statutory amendments, court decisions, and the Trump Administration’s efforts to streamline federal permitting. For decades, NEPA’s sparse statutory language provided few specifics on NEPA implementation, and the regulatory framework was based on implementing regulations promulgated by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) and judicial precedent interpreting those regulations. As a result of its requirements and challenges questioning agency compliance with those requirements, critical projects were slowed or abandoned due to NEPA review timeframes and the threat of litigation from project opponents.

Time 3 Minute Read

On September 29, 2025, the White House Council on Environmental Quality issued key guidance to federal agencies on implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act.

Time 6 Minute Read

On May 29, 2025, in a decision long-awaited by project developers, the Supreme Court issued Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado, which clarified the proper scope of review and deference to be afforded to agency decisionmaking under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This decision reinforces longstanding Supreme Court holdings and may help improve the NEPA process by providing support for agencies to focus their NEPA reviews on impacts associated with their authorizations.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page