The Shutdown Trickle Down Effects
Time 4 Minute Read
The Shutdown Trickle Down Effects
Categories: EPA, Water

With the federal government shutdown finally over after five weeks, the long-term effects are likely to have a lingering impact on regulatory and permitting programs for months to come. Even those federal agencies that were fully funded during the shutdown, such as the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), were stymied in their ability to undertake routine day-to-day operations during the lapse in appropriations. This post highlights two examples of the shutdown’s implications for regulatory reform and permitting in the natural resources arena.

First, one of the key regulations targeted for regulatory reform by the Trump administration is the 2015 “Waters of the United States” Rule (2015 WOTUS Rule). The 2015 WOTUS Rule sets forth the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) and Corps’s interpretation of a seminal statutory term—“the waters of the United States”—that establishes the geographic scope of the Agencies’ jurisdiction for all Clean Water Act (CWA) regulatory programs. Just after entering office, on February 28, 2017, President Trump signed an Executive Order setting into motion a process for the Agencies to review, rescind, and/or review the 2015 WOTUS Rule. 80 Fed. Reg. 37,054 (June 29, 2015). Consistent with this directive, the Agencies proposed, in July 2017, to repeal the 2015 WOTUS Rule and replace it with the prior regulatory definition of WOTUS. A supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking was published in June 2018, with the public comment period closing on August 13, 2018. According to the Fall 2018 Unified Agenda, the Agencies anticipated issuance of a final rule repealing the 2015 WOTUS Rule by March, 2019. But work on the final repeal was delayed as a result of the shutdown, likely postponing issuance of any final rule repealing the 2015 WOTUS Rule beyond the Agencies’ target.

Meanwhile, on December 11, 2018, the Agencies introduced a revised definition of WOTUS to clarify federal authority under the CWA. That proposal was made available on EPA’s website, but has yet to be published in the Federal Register, which will trigger a 60-day comment period. The Agencies’ Unified Agenda targets a final rule defining WOTUS by the end of 2019; but, again, the duration of the shutdown could complicate that endeavor, potentially pushing issuance of a new rule into 2020.

Second, the shutdown has serious implications for the Corps’ permitting program. The Corps was fully funded during the government shutdown, but many of the other federal agencies with which the Corps is legally required to coordinate and consult before issuing CWA permits and jurisdictional determinations (JDs) were not funded or staffed. For example, many Corps nationwide permit (NWP) verifications and individual permits (IPs) require Section 7 Endangered Species Act (ESA) consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and/or the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). Staff at these agencies were furloughed for over five weeks, and, thus, the Corps was unable to complete necessary evaluations and finalize permit decisions for certain JDs and NWP verifications and for all IPs, mitigation banking prospectuses, and other activities that require coordination and consultation. As of January 9, 2019, 1,265 general permits and 929 IPs were stalled pending completion of ESA consultation. The number of outstanding permits is likely substantially greater by now and rising! Now that the government is fully funded, the Corps and other agencies will address the backlog, but it will take time to catch-up. The impact of these delays is problematic as it means that project applicants may miss the ability to bid on projects, funding deadlines, and certain construction work windows. Commercial and residential developers, infrastructure projects, and “mom and pop” operations that rely on Corps permits may be forced to endure costly delays.

These examples are just a small snapshot of the impacts of the historic shutdown in the natural resources arena. Agency funding lapses can have significant consequences, and the recent lapse affected not only the administration’s regulatory reform efforts, but business, economic growth and development, and routine day-to-day operations across the country.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 1 Minute Read

The “prior converted cropland” exclusion exempts certain agricultural lands from Clean Water Act regulation. The 2025 “waters of the United States” proposed rule seeks to clarify and update this exclusion, making it easier for farmers to demonstrate that their prior converted cropland is not subject to the Clean Water Act. If finalized, the proposal could have significant benefits for agricultural producers nationwide.

Time 9 Minute Read

On November 20, 2025, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Department of the Army issued a notice of a proposed rulemaking to update the definition of “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act for consistency with the US Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency and to clarify key terms for implementation.

Time 2 Minute Read

On September 10, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) authorized the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) to regulate all underground injection of carbon dioxide for long-term geological sequestration within Arizona’s jurisdiction. The final rule followed a comprehensive technical and legal review to ensure the state’s Underground Injection Control (UIC) program met all requirements under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) section 1422. As discussed in an earlier post, Arizona previously did not have primacy over any UIC well classes, unlike other states that have sought Class VI primacy thus far.

Time 4 Minute Read

Last month saw several developments in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) ongoing efforts to authorize states to implement Class VI of the federal Underground Injection Control (UIC) program under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) for geologic sequestration of carbon. This push toward state primacy is an important development for the rapidly growing carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) industry, for which Class VI permits are the critical construction and operating permit. Currently, there are 62 CCS projects - including many with multiple wells - with permit applications pending with EPA. Project proponents anticipate that permitting will be faster if administered by the state instead of EPA. The latest developments last month include: (1) EPA’s proposal to grant primacy to Arizona; (2) EPA’s proposal to grant primacy to Texas; (3) a federal court decision rejecting a challenge to EPA’s earlier grant of primacy to Louisiana; and (4) an ongoing challenge to West Virginia’s recently granted primacy.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page