BREAKING: The U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Title VII Protects LGBTQ Employees
Time 2 Minute Read
BREAKING: The U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Title VII Protects LGBTQ Employees

In a 6-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on an employee’s sexual orientation and/or transgendered status.  Though Title VII does not expressly mention “sexual orientation” or “transgender,” the Court held that “homosexuality and transgender status are inextricably bound up with sex” and that “it is impossible to discriminate against a person for being homosexual or transgender without discriminating against that individual based on sex”—a protected class under Title VII.

Accordingly, the Court set forth a clear, bright-line rule:

“[I]n Title VII, Congress outlawed discrimination in the workplace on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Today, we must decide whether an employer can fire someone simply for being homosexual or transgender. The answer is clear. An employer who fires an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex.  Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what Title VII forbids.”

Though the Court acknowledged that Congress might not have expected “this particular result” when it enacted Title VII, the Court held that “Congress adopted broad language making it illegal for an employer to rely on an employee’s sex when deciding to fire that employee,” leading to the “necessary consequence” that “[a]n employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender defies the law.”

Though a growing number states have enacted legislation in recent years to protect LGBTQ employees, the Court’s ruling ushers in a sweeping change to Title VII and outlaws sexual orientation and transgender-based discrimination throughout the country, regardless of the underlying state law.  Employers should update their policies and practices to reflect this change.

  • Partner

    Ryan has distinguished himself as a nationwide litigator handling complex employment litigation, trade secret cases, and other high-stakes litigation.  Ryan has litigated cases in the state and federal courts of 25 states.  He has ...

  • Counsel

    Tyler represents and advises employers on a wide range of labor and employment matters, including complex wage and hour issues, union organizing and other traditional labor matters, discrimination claims and other employment ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in August issued a press release highlighting its “200 Days of Action to Protect Religious Freedom at Work.” 

Time 3 Minute Read

On June 5, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services that plaintiffs alleging employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 are not required to meet a heightened evidentiary standard based on their majority-group status.

Time 4 Minute Read

On February 19, 2025, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) Acting Chair Andrea Lucas vowed to prioritize anti-American national origin discrimination in compliance efforts, investigations, and litigation.

Time 5 Minute Read

On March 20, 2025, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) issued two key pieces of guidance: What To Do If You Experience Discrimination Related to DEI at Work and What You Should Know About DEI-Related Discrimination at Work.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page