D.C. to Require Pay Transparency, Prohibit Inquiry into Wage History
Time 3 Minute Read
D.C. to Require Pay Transparency, Prohibit Inquiry into Wage History

Washington, D.C. is the latest in a growing list of jurisdictions to require employers to have “pay transparency” in job postings. Starting in June of 2024, Washington, D.C. will require all employers with at least one employee in the District to post the minimum and maximum projected salary in all job listings or advertisements. The salary projections must be the lowest and highest salary or hourly pay the employer “in good faith believes” it would pay for the role.

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser signed the Wage Transparency Omnibus Amendment Act of 2023 on January 12, 2024. The legislation is currently in a 30-day congressional review period in which Congress may vote to overrule it. The legislation is drafted to go into effect on June 30, 2024.

In addition to requiring the posting of salary ranges, the law will prohibit employers from requesting a potential employee’s wage history from either the potential employee, or their previous employers. The bill further requires employers disclose available healthcare benefits to candidates before the first interview. The law does not contain a private right of action, but states that a prospective employee is permitted to inquire about the disclosures. Also, the Attorney General is given enforcement power to investigate or bring civil actions regarding violations of this law.

Jurisdictions including Colorado, California, Washington state, and New York City have already implemented pay transparency laws. Virginia may be next to join the list as bills are currently pending in the General Assembly that would require the posting of salary ranges and prohibit inquiries into wage history.

Empirical evidence has shown that pay transparency laws are successful in achieving their stated goal of reducing pay inequalities across gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and other protected characteristics.[1]  Where pay transparency merely exposes existing disparities, however, employee morale can be negatively impacted.

In preparing for this law, D.C. employers should conduct a review of current employee compensation to determine any discrepancies in pay that may be apparent to current employees once salary ranges are included on job postings. Employers should review the updated requirements with employees that conduct interviews, and review job applications to ensure they do not ask for wage history. Lastly, employers should plan ahead and determine what objective level of experience justifies what level of pay. Prospective employees may anticipate receiving the higher end of a posted salary range and could request an explanation if an offer does not match their expectations.


[1] https://hbr.org/2023/02/research-the-complicated-effects-of-pay-transparency

  • Partner

    Holly represents management in employment law litigation, trials, and advice, unfair competition litigation and advice, contract negotiations and litigation, drug testing planning, advice, policies, and litigation, and ...

  • Associate

    Libby advises employers in a wide range of labor and employment law matters. Libby represents employers in litigation before federal and state courts, including wage and hour class and collective actions and employment ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

On April 1, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the 2024 amendment to Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act, limiting damages, applies retroactively to pending cases.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 3 Minute Read

SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making. It would amend provisions in the Business and Professions Code and the Code of Civil Procedure to address confidentiality, accuracy, bias, and citation verification for attorneys, and to prohibit delegation of arbitral decision-making to AI while adding disclosure and responsibility requirements for arbitrators.

Time 3 Minute Read

On Feb. 23, 2026, New York Governor Kathy Hochul announced that the New York Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”) had published proposed rules implementing the state’s Buy Now, Pay Later (“BNPL”) law.  The proposal would establish the nation’s first comprehensive regulatory framework for the rapidly growing pay-over-time consumer market niche. 

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page