Deadline Approaching for California Retailers to Address Accessibility Issues for Point-of-Sale Devices
Time 3 Minute Read

Companies doing business in California, particularly retailers, should be aware of a recent revision to the California Financial Code that sets out new accessibility requirements for point-of-sale devices.  A point-of-sale device includes any device used by a customer for the purchase of a good or service with a debit, credit or cash card where a personal identification number (PIN) is required. 

The requirements are designed to make point-of-sale devices usable by persons with vision impairments who may not be able to read information on a flat screen point of sale device and who would otherwise have to provide their PIN to a store employee.

Pursuant to California Financial Code § 13082:

  • on or before January 1, 2010, any existing point-of-sale system . . . that includes a video touch screen or any other nontactile keypad shall also be equipped with a tactually discernable keypad or other technology described in this section.
  • at locations equipped with two or less point-of-sale machines, only one point-of-sale machine shall be required to be equipped with a tactually discernible keypad or other technology on or before January 1, 2010 . . . .

A point of sale device, for purposes Section 13082, “includes any device used by a customer for the purchase of a good or service where a personal identification number (PIN) is required,” but does not include (1) an automated teller machine as defined in Section 13020(c) or (2) a point-of-sale device that is equipped to, or exclusively services, motor fuel dispensers.  Cal. Fin. Code § 13082(d). 

In order to comply with Section 13082, point of sale devices must be equipped with the following:

  • a tactually discernible numerical keypad similar to a telephone keypad containing a raised dot with a dot base diameter between 1.5 millimeters and 1.6 millimeters and a height between 0.6 millimeters and 0.9 millimeters on the number 5 key that enables a visually impaired person to enter his or her own personal identification number or any other personal information necessary to process the transaction in a manner that provides the opportunity for the same degree of privacy input and output available to all individuals; or
  • other technology, such as a radio frequency identification device, fingerprint biometrics, or some other mechanism that enables a visually impaired person to access the video touch screen device with his or her personal identifier and to process his or her transaction in a manner that provides the opportunity for the same degree of privacy input and output available to all individuals.

Companies doing business in California have a short notice period in which to implement changes to their point-of-sale devices.  Failure to comply with this Section by the January 1, 2010 deadline may subject a company to potential liabilities.  In order to further minimize potential liability, affected companies are also encouraged to train employees to provide appropriate interaction with visually impaired customers regarding the use of the new tactile devices.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 4 Minute Read

In the case of Tarquinio v. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab (No. 24-1432), decided by the Fourth Circuit on June 25, 2025, the court addressed whether an employer had a duty under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to accommodate an employee who refused to provide medical documentation supporting her request for a COVID-19 vaccine exemption.

Time 4 Minute Read

In Stanley v. City of Sanford, Florida, the U.S. Supreme Court held a disabled former employee who neither “holds” nor “desires” a job is not a “qualified individual” under the ADA and, thus, cannot sue for disability discrimination following her employer’s revocation of retiree health benefits. 

Time 3 Minute Read

The Supreme Court of the United States recently granted certiorari in Stanley v. City of Sanford, Florida—a consequential case about whether the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) covers former employees.  The case has practical significance for employers. 

Time 3 Minute Read

While the intent of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act was to improve equality of access to goods and services offered by places of public accommodation, the Plaintiffs’ bar has seized on the law to recruit serial litigants—also known as “professional plaintiffs” or “paid testers”—to repeatedly sue businesses for minor, technical violations without actually seeking to purchase anything at all. 

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page