Downsizing & Data Loss - The Alarming Connection
Time 3 Minute Read

In an effort to ride out the current economic storm, many businesses find themselves downsizing, conducting mass layoffs, and even declaring Chapter 11 bankruptcy in an effort to survive.  These tough decisions inevitably lead to disgruntled former employees, whose ethics tend to take a backseat when it comes to “getting even” with their employers. 

Most modern companies are familiar with the need for day-to-day data security measures to protect confidential information.  During the chaos associated with conducting a mass layoff or downsizing, however, protecting confidential information often becomes less of a priority at a time when companies are most vulnerable.

Particularly disturbing is a recent study finding that as many as 58% of former employees have stolen data from their former employers, and 68% of those employees planned to use that information at their new jobs!  With the ease of which current technology allows for the instantaneous transmittal of electronic information, stealing company data is far from a hard or complicated endeavor, and can be as simple as a click of a mouse.  Most commonly, former employees take company information by downloading it to CDs, DVDs, and flash drives, or simply attaching the information to an email. 

The good news is that data loss during downsizing can be prevented with a few simple measures:

  • Require all new employees to sign a confidentiality and non-disclosure agreement.
  • Conduct ethics training to ensure employees understand the magnitude of taking proprietary or confidential information from the company.
  • Provide company owned storage devices to employees, and prohibit the use of personal storage devices (such as a USB drive).
  • Backup, Backup, Backup.  If an employee leaves with information that is not located anywhere else, it will be gone forever.
  • Interview departing employees to review signed confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements and obtain another signed acknowledgment.
  • During the exit interview, obtain a list of all of the confidential information, files and data that the departing employee may have had access to.
  • After the exit interview, conduct a review or audit of the departing employee’s paper files and electronic documents to ensure nothing is missing.
  • Monitor the departing employee’s conduct after the exit interview, including the employee’s computer activity, to look for any abnormal downloading of company files.
  • Prepare a list of all company property given to the employee and returned upon termination, including company laptops, blackberries, and any storage devices.
  • Immediately disable a departing employee’s access to company networks, computers, entry points and parking lots.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 4 Minute Read

While COVID-19 may have hit the business community like a hurricane, whether the pandemic, in fact, qualifies for a natural disaster exception under the federal law requiring businesses to warn employees of impending layoffs, remains an open question.

This February, a federal judge paved the way for the Eleventh Circuit to weigh in on whether a class action can proceed against an employer who was forced to lay off employees due to COVID-19.  That case, Benson v. Enter. Leasing Co. of Orlando, LLC, is one of the first to look at the application of pandemic-related layoffs to the Worker Adjustment Retraining Notification Act of 1988, 29 U.S.C. § 2100 et seq. (“WARN Act”). Underscoring the case’s importance to the business community, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has just filed an amicus or “friend of the court” brief asking the Eleventh Circuit to take up the case and provide “much-needed guidance” to other courts across the country.

Time 3 Minute Read

COVID-19 presents an array of new challenges and an abundance of uncertainty for employers. Notable among them, is the possibility that communities and states will begin to issue mandatory business closures and shelter in place orders. Interpreting and complying with these orders raises a host of issues for employers to consider.

Time 2 Minute Read

No doubt recognizing the unprecedented impact on business, Governor Gavin Newsom issued an Executive Order suspending the notice requirements under the California Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN Act), Cal. Lab. Code §§ 1401(a), 1402, 1403. The Executive Order suspends existing law that could have otherwise required employers to provide 60 days’ notice before instituting mass layoffs, relocations, or terminations, and could potentially have imposed steep penalties on employers who failed to do so.  Certain notice obligations remain, however, under the Executive Order.

Time 4 Minute Read

Employers in the difficult position of making workplace reductions because of COVID-19-related business losses should spare a moment for consideration of layoff notice obligations under the federal Worker Adjustment Retraining Notification Act of 1988, 29 U.S.C. § 2100 et seq. (“WARN”) and its state counterparts (so-called “mini-WARN” laws). The “unforeseen business circumstances” exception in federal WARN and most analogous state laws may excuse strict compliance with notification requirements, but employers should take the time now to analyze the applicability of this exception rather than make assumptions about it.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page