EEOC Releases New Guidance to Employers on Returning Employees to Work and ADA Compliance
Time 3 Minute Read
EEOC Letterhead

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the EEOC has periodically released updates to its Technical Assistance Questions and Answers, “What You Should Know About COVID-19 and the ADA, the Rehabilitation Act, and Other EEO Laws,” which Hunton previously posted about here and here. These questions and answers have provided employers with much needed guidance on the EEOC’s position on how employers can ensure the safety of their employees while at the same time not running afoul of the ADA.

On May 5, 2020, and then again on May 7, 2020, the EEOC updated its Technical Assistance Questions and Answers. These latest updates address the EEOC’s position on whether, and in which circumstances, an employer may prevent an employee from returning to work because the employer knows the employee has a medical condition that will place the employee at a higher risk of severe illness if the employee were to contract COVID-19 (e.g., those with chronic lung disease, asthma, heart disease, or are immunocompromised).

First, the new guidance makes clear that “[i]f the employer is concerned about the employee’s health being jeopardized upon returning to the workplace, the ADA does not allow the employer to exclude the employee – or take any other adverse action – solely because the employee has a disability that the CDC identifies as potentially placing him at ‘higher risk for severe illness’ if he gets COVID-19.” Rather, the employer may only take this action if the employee’s illness poses a “direct threat” to the employee’s health that cannot be reduced or eliminated by a reasonable accommodation. The EEOC notes that this is a high standard, and an employer seeking to exclude an employee based on a direct threat to the employee’s health must consider “the duration of the risk, the nature and severity of the potential harm, the likelihood that the potential harm will occur, and the imminence of the potential harm.”

And even in the event an employer determines an employee’s disability poses a direct threat to the employee’s own health, the employer may still not take an adverse action or exclude the employee on this basis unless, absent undue hardship, the employer cannot provide an employee a reasonable accommodation. The EEOC lists several reasonable accommodations employer’s should consider that may accommodate a medical condition of an employee at a higher risk for severe illness if the employee contracts COVID-19, such as providing PPE, erecting barriers around the employee’s workspace to offer additional protection, modified work hours, and telework.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 4 Minute Read

In the case of Tarquinio v. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab (No. 24-1432), decided by the Fourth Circuit on June 25, 2025, the court addressed whether an employer had a duty under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to accommodate an employee who refused to provide medical documentation supporting her request for a COVID-19 vaccine exemption.

Time 4 Minute Read

In Stanley v. City of Sanford, Florida, the U.S. Supreme Court held a disabled former employee who neither “holds” nor “desires” a job is not a “qualified individual” under the ADA and, thus, cannot sue for disability discrimination following her employer’s revocation of retiree health benefits. 

Time 2 Minute Read

The 2024 EEO-1 Component 1 data collection process is expected to move forward, based on documentation submitted to the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval.

Time 4 Minute Read

On February 19, 2025, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) Acting Chair Andrea Lucas vowed to prioritize anti-American national origin discrimination in compliance efforts, investigations, and litigation.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page