Illinois Bans Employer Inquiries on Salary History, Continues Trend
Time 2 Minute Read
Illinois Bans Employer Inquiries on Salary History, Continues Trend

Illinois joined a handful of other states when its prohibition on employer inquiries into applicants’ prior wage or salary information took effect this week.

Under the law, no employers in Illinois can ask about the wage or salary histories of job applicants.  If an employer receives salary history information voluntarily from the applicant, the employer still may not use that information to screen candidates.

The Illinois law does not apply if an applicant’s salary history is publicly available or if the applicant is applying internally for a new job at the same company.  It also does not prohibit employers from discussing an applicant’s expectations with respect to their salary, benefits or other compensation.

Applicants may enforce the law through private causes of action, and penalties for violation of the law can range from $500 to $10,000 depending on the size of the employer.  The law also allows for recovery of attorney’s fees, so it could encourage litigation despite the relatively limited damages available.

Several other states, including California, Delaware and Connecticut, already have similar salary history inquiry bans in place for all employers in the state.  Some localities, including Cincinnati, Ohio and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania also have similar laws in place.  Even more states are either considering similar legislation, or have laws set to take effect next year.  For example, a similar New Jersey law prohibiting salary history discrimination will become effective on January 1, 2020.

The Illinois law and others like it reflect a larger trend of restricting the use of employee background information for employment decisions.  Several states and localities have enacted Ban the Box legislation that limits an employer’s right to consider an applicant’s criminal history.  Congress is also considering legislation to curtail the use of consumer credit reports in employment decisions.

  • Partner

    Ryan has distinguished himself as a nationwide litigator handling complex employment litigation, trade secret cases, and other high-stakes litigation.  Ryan has litigated cases in the state and federal courts of 25 states.  He has ...

  • Associate

    Reilly counsels employers on labor-management relations, OSHA compliance and complex employment law issues. Reilly has worked on multiple union organizing campaigns and counseled employers through the representation ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

On September 5, 2025, the U.S. President Trump signed into law the Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act, H.R. 2808 which amends the Fair Credit Reporting Act to prohibit the furnishing of “trigger leads” except in limited circumstances.

Time 2 Minute Read

On January 16, 2025, the FTC announced a proposed order against General Motors and OnStar that would resolve allegations that the companies collected, used and sold drivers’ precise geolocation data and driving behavior information from millions of vehicles without adequately notifying consumers and obtaining their affirmative consent.

Time 4 Minute Read

“Ban-the-Box” legislation has seen steady growth throughout the country for more than two decades.  Currently, there is no federal legislation on the topic for private employers but a good number of states have limited their ability to inquire about or make decisions based on a prospective employee’s criminal background history.

Time 2 Minute Read

On December 7, 2023, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) ruled that credit scoring constitutes automated decision-making, which is prohibited under Article 22 of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) unless certain conditions are met. In a case stemming from consumer complaints against German credit bureau SCHUFA, the CJEU found that the company’s reliance on fully automated processes to calculate creditworthiness and extend credit constitutes automated decision-making which produces a legal or similarly significant effect within the meaning of Article 22 of the GDPR.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page