New California Laws Increase Employee Protections
Time 2 Minute Read
New California Laws Increase Employee Protections

This month, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed several employment-related bills into law. The laws go into effect January 1, 2020, and include an extension to the deadline to file certain state discrimination claims and address harassment training and prevention, as well as mandatory arbitration agreements.

The Stop Harassment and Reporting Extension Act, AB 9, extends the deadline for filing harassment, discrimination and other claims under the state’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) from one year to three years. The lengthening of the statute of limitations—although not retroactive—prolongs employers’ exposure to claims under the FEHA, potentially increasing the value of such claims to employees, as well as a corresponding risk of such claims against employers. Employers should, accordingly, apply additional diligence when evaluating such claims.

AB 547 affects the hospitality and other industries as it takes measures to address refinements in harassment training and prevention for janitorial workers. Similarly, SB 530 addresses sexual harassment training and prevention measures for construction workers.

Another new California law, AB 51, prohibits employers from requiring applicants and employees to waive a right, forum, or procedure under the FEHA and the California Labor Code. Related statute SB 707 provides for severe penalties—including losing the right to arbitrate claims—for the drafter an arbitration agreement who fails to pay arbitration fees within 30 days of the due date.

These laws, along with other states’ recently enacted laws, illustrate the shifting trend toward further employee protections through employment laws throughout the country, and employers should continue to monitor developments in this area.

  • Senior Attorney

    Marshall is a Board Certified Labor and Employment attorney that focuses his practice on representing employers in litigation involving restrictive covenants (including applications for injunctive relief), Title VII, Age ...

  • Partner

    Holly represents management in employment law litigation, trials, and advice, unfair competition litigation and advice, contract negotiations and litigation, drug testing planning, advice, policies, and litigation, and ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

California has introduced Assembly Bill 2244, proposing a pioneering “California Certified” labeling standard for foods not classified as ultra-processed. The bill relies on forthcoming regulatory definitions and imposes retail placement requirements for qualifying products. As California continues to advance UPF regulation, this initiative is expected to shape food law trends nationwide.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 1 Minute Read

The California Consumer Privacy Act continues to drive significant enforcement activity—particularly when minors’ data is involved. In a recent action, the California Privacy Protection Agency imposed a $1.1 million fine on youth sports platform PlayOn Sports for alleged violations involving student data and inadequate opt-out mechanisms. The case highlights growing regulatory scrutiny around how companies collect, share, and provide transparency about personal information—especially when schools and students are involved. 

Time 2 Minute Read

On March 3, 2026, the CalPrivacy announced its first enforcement action involving student privacy, requiring PlayOn Sports to pay a $1.10 million fine for alleged violations of the CCPA’s opt-out rights and requirements.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page