New California Legislation Protects Workers’ Personal Marijuana Use
Time 2 Minute Read
New California Legislation Protects Workers’ Personal Marijuana Use

On September 18, 2022, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill (“AB”) 2188, which prohibits employer discrimination based on employees’ use of cannabis off the job and away from the workplace.  While recreational use of cannabis, or marijuana, has been legal in California since 2016, the new law goes farther in specifically providing protections for employees who consume the substance.  AB 2188 makes California the most recent state to provide workplace protections for use of marijuana away from the workplace.  The bill will become effective beginning January 1, 2024.

AB 2188 amends the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) to make it unlawful to discriminate again a person in hiring, termination, or any term or condition of employment based on (i) the “person’s use of cannabis off the job and away from the workplace,” or (ii) an “employer-required drug screening test that has found the person to have nonpsychoactive cannabis metabolites in their hair, blood, urine, or other bodily fluids.”  The new law makes clear that employers are still permitted to make employment decisions based on tests for marijuana impairment as long as such tests do not rely on the presence of nonpsychoactive metabolites that are present in the body after consuming marijuana and specifically Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the substance that is primarily responsible for the psychoactive effects of marijuana use.  These metabolites can remain in the body for weeks after an individual has consumed marijuana.  Moreover, the bill states that nothing in its language “affects the rights or obligations of an employer to maintain a drug-and alcohol-free workplace” or “any other rights or obligations of an employer specified by federal law or regulation.”

The law also includes several carve-outs for specific industries and employees.  AB 2188 will not apply to employees in the building and construction trades or applicants or employees hired for positions that require a federal government background investigation or security clearance.  The bill also explicitly states it does not pre-empt other laws requiring applicants or employees to be tested for controlled substances, including laws relating to the receipt of federal funding, federal licensing-related benefits, or entering into federal contracts.

California employers may want to review and update their workplace drug policies and procedures for drug testing, if applicable.

  • Associate

    Mike represents businesses and their executives across a broad spectrum of industries, focusing his practice on high-stakes employment litigation, complex commercial cases, and strategic advice to his clients. His practice ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

California has introduced Assembly Bill 2244, proposing a pioneering “California Certified” labeling standard for foods not classified as ultra-processed. The bill relies on forthcoming regulatory definitions and imposes retail placement requirements for qualifying products. As California continues to advance UPF regulation, this initiative is expected to shape food law trends nationwide.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 1 Minute Read

The California Consumer Privacy Act continues to drive significant enforcement activity—particularly when minors’ data is involved. In a recent action, the California Privacy Protection Agency imposed a $1.1 million fine on youth sports platform PlayOn Sports for alleged violations involving student data and inadequate opt-out mechanisms. The case highlights growing regulatory scrutiny around how companies collect, share, and provide transparency about personal information—especially when schools and students are involved. 

Time 2 Minute Read

On March 3, 2026, the CalPrivacy announced its first enforcement action involving student privacy, requiring PlayOn Sports to pay a $1.10 million fine for alleged violations of the CCPA’s opt-out rights and requirements.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page