Stop, Look, And Listen Before Terminating An Employee During A Union Organizing Campaign
Time 2 Minute Read

We’ve been talking about the “new” NLRB and its pro-union slant all year, so its latest procedural revisions should not come as a surprise to you. On September 30, 2010,  NLRB Acting General Counsel, Lafe Solomon, announced an initiative to “strengthen and streamline the Agency’s response to charges filed when employees are fired in the midst of a union organizing campaign.”

In short, the General Counsel’s office is now considering seeking a federal injunction that will compel an employer to offer reinstatement to the fired workers pending litigation of the underlying unfair labor practice case in all cases found to be meritorious.  And, it will do it as quickly as possible. Regional Directors are required immediately to investigate allegations of unlawful firings in organizing cases and, if merit is found, to submit them to the General Counsel’s office with a short memo, ideally within a week of their findings.  Solomon says he will personally review each case upon recommendation, and the injunctions will be sought under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act once authorized by the Board.

On October 5, the NLRB began posting case names and status updates for all 10(j) injunction cases authorized by the Board on its website.

Employers should consider seeking counsel when considering employee terminations while a union organizing campaign is taking place.  Not only should the grounds for termination be reviewed carefully as always, but the employer should be prepared for the possibility of enhanced attention and expedited action by the NLRB.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 6 Minute Read

Scabby the Rat is a familiar sight in disputes between unions and employers. Scabby, a giant inflatable rat with red eyes, fangs, and claws, is often placed outside the places of business of employers with whom a union has a labor dispute (the “primary” employer).  Recently, the NLRB again addressed the issue of whether such union protests can be directed against a “secondary” neutral employer who does business with the primary employer but who is not party to the underlying labor dispute.

Time 3 Minute Read

On June 1, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit overturned a NLRB determination that a manager’s incorrect blaming of a union for discrepancies in an employee’s paid-leave time constituted an unfair labor practice. The pivotal issue was whether the manager’s statements had a reasonable tendency to interfere with employees’ labor rights. As discussed below, the D.C. Circuit rejected the NLRB’s determination that the manager’s statements had a reasonable tendency to interfere with employees’ labor rights, reasoning that the manager’s misstatements were lawful expressions of the employer’s opinions.

Time 1 Minute Read

During the 2020 legislative session, Virginia passed several important employment bills. Perhaps none is more consequential than H.B. 582. Effective as of May 21, 2021, it permits the governing bodies of Virginia cities, towns, counties, and school boards to adopt a local resolution or ordinance authorizing collective bargaining and recognizing labor unions. The bill provides no guidance on how to create and implement a union recognition and bargaining process, leaving such decisions to covered localities. Consequently, the burden to fill in the gaps will fall to local ...

Time 1 Minute Read

1570042501

The NLRB Continues Its Trend of Employer-Friendly Decisions

This summer, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) issued several decisions that could have important effects for retailers. This article summarizes two of those decisions and explains how they could impact employers.

Continue Reading

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page