Washington, D.C. Council Votes to Ban the Box
Time 2 Minute Read

On July 14, 2014, the Council of the District of Columbia (“D.C. Council”) unanimously voted to “ban the box,” approving a bill that will restrict when an employer may ask a job applicant about his criminal background.  The bill will now go to Mayor Vincent Gray for his signature, and then to Congress for approval.

Under Bill 20-642, the Fair Criminal Records Screening Act -- commonly referred to as the “ban the box” bill -- a D.C. employer may only ask about an applicant’s criminal background after making a conditional offer of employment.  If the bill becomes law, the District would join 12 states that have passed similar “ban the box” legislation (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico, and Rhode Island), and become part of a growing movement to block employers from including a check box on a job application form that asks “Have you ever been convicted of a crime?”

Advocates for D.C.’s “ban the box” bill assert that having to check the box prevents many ex-offenders from getting a fair shot at a job, and point out that the proposed law would not apply to employers hiring applicants for “sensitive” jobs, like child care, from asking about an applicant’s criminal history in a job application.  Those who oppose D.C.’s proposed “ban the box” bill argue that it is too burdensome on employers, as it would require employers to go through the hiring process before learning about a conviction record, and would then need to restart the process if the conviction was a non-starter, at which point prior applicants may no longer be interested in the position.

For further information regarding this issue, please see “The Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment Decisions: A Critique of the EEOC Guidance,” Seton Hall Law Review: Vol. 43: Iss. 3, Article 3 (2013).

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

The results are in: attorneys are filing more employment law cases in court.  Indeed, year-end reporting from legal databases like LexMachina confirm that the pace of filing new employment discrimination cases reached its highest level in 2025, surpassing 20,000 new filings nationwide.  Though overtime and minimum wage lawsuits under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) have continued to decline since 2015, discrimination cases under laws like Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act are on the rise.

Time 3 Minute Read

On June 5, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services that plaintiffs alleging employment discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 are not required to meet a heightened evidentiary standard based on their majority-group status.

Time 4 Minute Read

On February 19, 2025, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) Acting Chair Andrea Lucas vowed to prioritize anti-American national origin discrimination in compliance efforts, investigations, and litigation.

Time 5 Minute Read

On March 20, 2025, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) issued two key pieces of guidance: What To Do If You Experience Discrimination Related to DEI at Work and What You Should Know About DEI-Related Discrimination at Work.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page