What New York Employers Need To Know About The Women’s Equality Act
Time 2 Minute Read

On January 19, 2016, a series of bills in New York commonly known as the Women’s Equality Act will take effect. These laws are intended to help achieve pay equity, strengthen human trafficking laws and protections for domestic violence victims, and end pregnancy discrimination in all workplaces, by, among other things:

• Broadening the same establishment definition for a pay disparity analysis to include geographic locations within the same county;

• Setting up and clarifying the burden shifting paradigm for pay disparity cases;

• Requiring employers to show a “bona fide factor such as education, training or experience” that supports the difference in pay and to also show that such factor(s) is/are job related and consistent with business necessity;

• Permitting an employee to challenge the business necessity and non-sex based justifications provided by the employer for the pay disparity by proving: (1) the employer’s practice causes a disparate impact on the basis of sex; (2) a viable alternative practice exists that would both remove the wage differential and serve the same business purpose; and (3) the employer refused to adopt the alternative practice;

• Preventing employers from prohibiting an employee “from inquiring about, discussing or disclosing his/her wage or those of another employees;”

• Providing that, for willful violations of the state’s equal pay law, an aggrieved employee may recover liquidated damages equal to 300 percent of the unpaid wages owed to such employee;

• Amending the state’s anti-discrimination law to require that employers provide reasonable accommodations to employees because of a “pregnancy-related condition;”

• Adding “familial status” to the list of protected classes under the state’s anti-discrimination law;

• Allowing for the recovery of attorneys’ fees to “any prevailing party” in sex discrimination cases; and

• Providing that sexual harassment claims may be asserted against “all employers,” regardless of their size.

To prepare for these new laws, New York employers should review their obligations under the Women’s Equality Act and, in particular, their pay practices.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

Executive Order 12866 requires federal agencies to publish an agenda of regulations they plan to propose, promulgate, or review in the coming one-year period.  The Department of Labor’s regulatory agenda showed ambitious goals for its agencies in 2022, as does President Biden’s Build Back Better Framework. Employers should brace themselves for increased enforcement activity from agencies such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”), and the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (“OFCCP”).

Time 2 Minute Read

Yesterday, Governor Cuomo signed the last of several bills that massively overhauls New York State’s discrimination and harassment laws.  The changes, some of which are effective immediately, are explained in more detail here.

The main takeaways are as follows:

Time 2 Minute Read

We previously posted on the unfortunate ruling in March 2019, when a Federal Court reinstituted the “Component 2” wage reporting in the annual EEO-1 Report.  The highly controversial requirement – that employers annually report, to the government, W-2 earnings and hours worked for all employees – had been proposed in 2016, but stayed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in 2017.

Time 2 Minute Read

This morning, the U.S. Supreme Court punted a key Equal Pay Act (“EPA”) case back to the Ninth Circuit because the decision’s author, Judge Stephen Reinhardt, passed away shortly before the decision was formally issued.

Yovino v. Rizo is a significant EPA case that has been winding its way through the courts for years.  In 2017, a Ninth Circuit panel held that a wage differential based on prior salary can qualify as a “factor other than sex” under the EPA.  But, in 2018, the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, came to the opposite conclusion: “prior salary alone or in combination with other factors cannot justify a wage differential.”  The en banc opinion was authored by Judge Reinhardt, who passed away 11 days before the decision was issued.  The opinion acknowledged the Judge’s passing with a footnote stating that voting had been completed and the decision was written prior to his death. 

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page