D&O Insurance: An Essential Tool in the Evolving ESG Landscape
Time 3 Minute Read
Categories: D&O, Environmental

On September 26, 2023, KPMG published independent research showing that three-quarters of global businesses feel they are not ready for new ESG reporting regulations. KPMG’s findings are the latest reminder to businesses—and their directors and officers and other insureds—about the important role that Directors & Officers (D&O) insurance can play as businesses and organizations strive for ESG compliance and work to mitigate ESG-related risks.

Increased Regulatory & Shareholder Scrutiny

The evolving ESG landscape is causing considerable uncertainty for many companies, both in terms of compliance strategies, but also in avoiding lawsuits and regulatory investigations.

Companies are facing a host of new mandatory ESG reporting regulations in both the United States and abroad, including the SEC’s anticipated climate disclosure rule, California’s landmark climate disclosure laws and the EU’s CSRD, among others. Companies are also experiencing increased risk of regulatory enforcement actions relating to ESG disclosures. The SEC, for example, has accelerated ESG enforcement efforts in recent years, highlighting the SEC’s heightened focus on public-facing ESG-related disclosures.

Litigation-driven demands relating to ESG action—and inaction—are also growing. On the one hand, companies are facing increased pressure from many investors and other stakeholders to expand their ESG initiatives and commitments. Companies that ignore these demands open themselves up to litigation risk for not doing enough. On the other hand, with the growing anti-ESG movement, companies face the risk of litigation when they do take action. These developments show the bind that businesses, and their directors and officers, face. They can be sued for ignoring ESG. But they can also be sued for considering ESG.

A Proactive Approach to D&O Insurance & ESG

Against this backdrop, businesses should consider the important role that D&O insurance can play in mitigating risk and potential uninsured exposures, as well as its role in assuring protection for directors, officers, and key employees who qualify as insureds. While D&O policies may generally respond to claims against corporations and their management spurred by these types of ESG risks, the specific policy language is crucial. For example, D&O insurance policies often afford coverage for regulatory investigations, with some policies specifically extending such coverage for books and records demands, and securities lawsuits alleging inadequate disclosure. But even when D&O insurance policies include specific coverage for these potentialities, D&O insurers, regardless of the explicit coverage provided for government investigations and other non-litigation matters, may nevertheless seek to limit coverage by asserting exclusions, sublimits, or narrow definitions of covered conduct.

With the risks posed by ESG rules and disclosures evolving, and the uncertainty of how D&O policy terms may apply to ESG risks, consultation with experienced coverage counsel is essential to position businesses’ insurance assets to respond to new and evolving ESG-related risks. Where businesses cannot completely avoid ESG-related liabilities, they can, by being proactive about insurance issues, at least mitigate the impact that these exposures have on the corporate bottom line.

* This is a modified version of an article included in Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP’s ESG Hot Topics – Fall 2023 newsletter

  • Partner

    Mike is a Legal 500 and Chambers USA-ranked lawyer with more than 25 years of experience litigating insurance disputes and advising clients on insurance coverage matters.

    Mike Levine is a partner in the firm’s Washington, DC ...

  • Special Counsel

    A nationally recognized insurance coverage litigator, Lorie handles all aspects of complex, commercial litigation and arbitration for policyholders. Chambers-ranked and recognized as a “top 10 Super Lawyer,” Lorie has ...

  • Associate

    Alex assists corporate and individual policyholders with complex insurance coverage matters. He works on a variety of insurance policies, including directors and officers liability, builders’ risk, errors and omissions ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 1 Minute Read

In Illinois National Insurance Company v. Harman International Industries Incorporated, No. N22C-05-098 (Del. 2026), the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed D&O coverage for a $28 million settlement of a securities class action, finding the policies’ “bump-up” exclusion inapplicable to the settlement.

In a recent legal update, Hunton attorneys Steven Haas, Johnathon E. SchronceGeoffrey B. Fehling, and Madalyn Moore discuss important takeaways from the Harman decision for policyholders who find themselves embroiled in M&A litigation. The decision underscores the continued relevance of bump-up exclusions, how those exclusions can lead to coverage disputes involving M&A litigation, and the importance of policyholders’ awareness of potential bump-up coverage issues when placing or renewing D&O coverage, pursuing transactions, and defending and settling deal-related claims.

Time 4 Minute Read

On August 21, 2023, Southern California was hit by its first tropical storm since 1997.  The remnants of Hurricane Hilary brought record-breaking rainfall and knocked out power for thousands of Californians. This storm follows devastating wildfires in Maui, which killed over 110 people, and hot tub temperatures off the coast of Florida: the ocean reached 101 degrees (it should be just 74-88 degrees). The ocean’s record temperatures may strengthen the severity and prolong the season of this year’s hurricanes, which already plague Florida. According to an Accuweather meteorologist, the warm weathers are “just inviting a big system to hit the state again this year.” His prediction may prove true: Tropical Storm Idalia, expected to strengthen into a major hurricane, is scheduled to hit Tampa on Wednesday.

Time 4 Minute Read

The White House announced on July 22, 2021, President Biden’s nomination of David Uhlmann to be the Assistant Administrator for Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA) at the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Uhlmann is currently the director of the Environmental Law and Policy Program at the University of Michigan Law School and was previously a federal prosecutor for 17 years, including as the Chief of the Environmental Crimes Section of the US Department of Justice. His nomination signals the White House’s clear intent to reinvigorate EPA’s enforcement program after what the EPA’s Inspector General found in its March 31, 2020 report to be years of declining case statistics across multiple administrations.

Time 5 Minute Read

Last week, among many actions taken by the Biden-Harris Administration on Earth Day 2021, one may have flown under the proverbial radar, though it does have significant legal implications for greenhouse gas regulation and the whole-of-government(s) approach:  the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) notice proposing to repeal the preemption portions of NHTSA’s 2019 rule entitled “The Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule Part One: One National Program,” 84 Fed. Reg. 51,310 (Sept. 27, 2019) (SAFE I Rule).  NHTSA, “Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Preemption; Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (signed Apr. 24, 2021) (Proposed Rule).

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page