Consumer Protection in Retail: Weekly Roundup (Private Action)
Time 3 Minute Read

This past week, several consumer actions made headlines:

General Mills Faces Potential Class Action Over Health Claims of Sugary Foods

General Mills has been sued in the Northern District of California over claims that it has put misleading labels on a number of its products. According to the complaint, labels with phrases such as “whole grains” and “fiber” are deceptive “because they are incompatible with the significant dangers of the excessive added sugar.” General Mills and other large food companies have been facing similar suits over labelling recently, including a lawsuit over the protein content of its “Cheerios Protein” brand.

Pinnacle Settles with Kraft Heinz Over “Craving” Slogan

Pinnacle Foods Group LLC (“Pinnacle”) has dropped its lawsuit against Kraft Heinz Co. regarding alleged trademark infringement. Pinnacle alleged that Kraft Heinz infringed on the slogan of Pinnacle’s Hungry-Man frozen meals when it introduced “Satisfy Your Cravings” as the slogan for Kraft Heinz’s new brand of Devour frozen meals. Details of the settlement have not been released.

Supplement Maker Must Face Allegations of Rigging Online Reviews

Supplement maker HeartWise Inc. will have to face Lanham Act claims that it made its employees manipulate online reviews for its benefit. Competitor Vitamins Online brought claims against HeartWise that it had engaged in false advertising and misleading practices. According to Vitamins Online, HeartWise had its employees flag negative reviews of its NatureWise products as “unhelpful” and positive reviews as “helpful.” Additionally, Vitamins Online alleged that NatureWise provided free products to customers who posted positive reviews on an online retailer’s site.

A U.S. district judge has ruled that Vitamins Online failed to prove that providing free products to customers was illegal or that it would cause those customers to publish false or misleading reviews. But the judge also held that NatureWise employees may have mislead consumers by making it appear as if other customers were upvoting positive reviews while suppressing negative reviews.

Proposed Class Action Alleges Jessica Alba’s Honest Co. Engaged in Deceptive Labeling and Marketing

A proposed class action has been filed against The Honest Company, alleging that it has been mislabeling and promoting its products as “natural” despite using synthetic or potentially harmful ingredients. The Honest Company, which was founded by actress Jessica Alba, promotes its products as “natural, safe, beautiful, effective,” and that they are “Free from fraud or deception.” But according to the complaint filed in the Central District of California, The Honest Company used synthetic ingredients which the Environmental Working Group has rated as potentially hazardous. Plaintiffs are seeking class certification and damages of at least $5 million.

Publix Accused of Using Wood Pulp as Filler in Grated Parmesan

A Florida lawsuit has alleged that Publix has engaged in deceptive practices by including cellulose derived from wood pulp as a filler in its “100% Real” grated parmesan cheese products. Cellulose is often used in small amounts to act as an anti-clumping agent, but the complaint alleges that the Publix cheese includes significantly more cellulose than needed to prevent clumping or caking, thus acting as filler rather than as an anti-clumping agent. Similar lawsuits have been lodged against other retailers and manufacturers recently.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

California has introduced Assembly Bill 2244, proposing a pioneering “California Certified” labeling standard for foods not classified as ultra-processed. The bill relies on forthcoming regulatory definitions and imposes retail placement requirements for qualifying products. As California continues to advance UPF regulation, this initiative is expected to shape food law trends nationwide.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 1 Minute Read

The California Consumer Privacy Act continues to drive significant enforcement activity—particularly when minors’ data is involved. In a recent action, the California Privacy Protection Agency imposed a $1.1 million fine on youth sports platform PlayOn Sports for alleged violations involving student data and inadequate opt-out mechanisms. The case highlights growing regulatory scrutiny around how companies collect, share, and provide transparency about personal information—especially when schools and students are involved. 

Time 3 Minute Read

The results are in: attorneys are filing more employment law cases in court.  Indeed, year-end reporting from legal databases like LexMachina confirm that the pace of filing new employment discrimination cases reached its highest level in 2025, surpassing 20,000 new filings nationwide.  Though overtime and minimum wage lawsuits under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) have continued to decline since 2015, discrimination cases under laws like Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act are on the rise.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page