Fashion Accountability Update: New York Bills Live On
Time 1 Minute Read
Categories: Regulatory

In 2025, California, Massachusetts, New York, and Washington advanced fashion accountability legislation targeting supply chain due diligence and environmental disclosures from major fashion companies. Heading into the 2026 legislative session, most of these bills have lost momentum: California and Washington’s measures are now inactive, Massachusetts’ proposal remains in study with limited prospects, and only New York’s bill is still under committee review. While each state’s legislative process varies, the window for action on these bills in 2026 has largely closed. Businesses should continue to track these developments, as similar proposals could reemerge in 2027.

Read more...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

In 2025, four states—California, Massachusetts, New York, and Washington—proposed fashion accountability bills. These bills would require high-earning entities in the fashion industry to conduct extensive supply chain due diligence, and to monitor and report greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, water use, and chemical management.

Time 6 Minute Read

Chemical manufacturers, product makers, and product retailers are gearing up for new state-level restrictions on products sold in stores and online that contain per- and-polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). A total of 18 states have PFAS product restrictions ranging from bans to reporting to labeling requirements. The laws target primarily food packaging, cosmetics, cookware, and textiles, but some states have expansive laws that include all types of products. Each year for the past four years, approximately 200 PFAS-related bills are introduced in state legislatures, and we expect this trend to continue, potentially adding to the growing patchwork of PFAS restrictions.

Time 4 Minute Read

In 2025, California, Massachusetts, New York, and Washington proposed fashion accountability bills to impose environmental due diligence requirements on high-earning businesses in the fashion industry.

Time 1 Minute Read

The Trump administration’s pledge to impose tariffs on Canada, China, and Mexico have many U.S. companies concerned about higher-priced inputs and disrupted supply chains. In an article published by the Export Practitioner, counsel Jorge Aviles and associate Jae Lynn Huckaba explore the insurance coverage options, such as political risk insurance and trade credit insurance, that can offer coverage to protect against and mitigate trade-related risks. The article also provides advice on how policyholders can maximize coverage should a loss occur, and further discusses the impact that tariffs might have on the insurance market, including premiums for certain types of insurance lines.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page