Fashion Accountability Update: New York Bill Lives On
Time 2 Minute Read
Fashion Accountability Update: New York Bill Lives On
Categories: ESG

In 2025, four states—California, Massachusetts, New York, and Washington—proposed fashion accountability bills. These bills would require high-earning entities in the fashion industry to conduct extensive supply chain due diligence, and to monitor and report greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, water use, and chemical management.

Since our last update, the fashion accountability bills have largely stalled in the 2026 legislative session.

All four legislatures operate on two-year cycles (called a “biennium”), starting on odd-numbered years. Bills that are not acted upon or do not meet certain deadlines during the first year of the cycle are carried over to the second year. If these bills do not meet certain deadlines or are not acted on in the second year, they “die” and can no longer be acted on. While the processes of the four legislatures are similar, they differ slightly, including having different requirements for carried-over bills to continue in the legislative session.

California and Washington’s fashion accountability bills have stalled in committee and can no longer be acted on in 2026. California’s bill, AB 405, failed to get out of committee by January 31, 2026, as required by the California Constitution. Cal. Const. art. IV, § 10(c). Washington’s bill, HB 1107, failed to pass its house of origin by February 17, 2026, as required by legislature cut-off deadlines.

Massachusetts’ fashion accountability bill, H. 1032, was issued a study order for additional consideration. A study order authorizes the committee to sit during recess and continue studying a set of bills. The vast majority of these bills do not make it out of the study order. So, while the Massachusetts bill is technically still active, it seems unlikely that there will be further committee action it this year.

New York’s fashion accountability bill, A4631B, is still active and was referred to the Assembly Consumer Affairs and Protection committee on January 7, 2026. The New York legislature has not indicated the likelihood of A4631B making it through the legislative process.

We will continue to monitor the New York and Massachusetts bills throughout the remainder of the 2026 sessions. Retailers should continue to monitor this legislation and future proposals because it is possible that similar bills will be reintroduced in 2027.

  • Partner

    Rachel is a trusted advisor to clients navigating the rapidly evolving landscape of environmental law and corporate sustainability. With over a decade of experience across private practice, in government service, and as in-house ...

  • Counsel

    Hannah focuses her practice on ESG and sustainability, securities law, and corporate governance for both domestic and international clients. Her experience spans advising on ESG reporting and governance, US securities laws ...

  • Associate

    Chloe is a member of the firm’s corporate team and focuses her practice on mergers and acquisitions, corporate governance, and general corporate law. She also assists clients with a variety of securities law matters.

    While in law ...

  • Associate

    As an associate in the firm’s environmental practice group, Sadie counsels clients on a broad range of issues, such as sustainability, supply chain management, and natural resources. Her experience includes research and ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 5 Minute Read

A recent summary judgment order is a reminder that, in insurance coverage disputes, straightforward arguments can still win the day. In a coverage action arising from dozens of underlying personal injury suits, the court adopted a clear, text-based approach to the duty to defend—and ordered the insurer to provide a defense.

Time 3 Minute Read

On March 24, 2026, Washington Governor Bob Ferguson signed House Bill 2225, an Act regulating artificial intelligence companion chatbots.

Time 2 Minute Read

California has introduced Assembly Bill 2244, proposing a pioneering “California Certified” labeling standard for foods not classified as ultra-processed. The bill relies on forthcoming regulatory definitions and imposes retail placement requirements for qualifying products. As California continues to advance UPF regulation, this initiative is expected to shape food law trends nationwide.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page