EPA Proposes to Delay Start of Reporting Period and Submission Deadline for Expansive PFAS Reporting Rule Under the Toxic Substances Control Act
Time 3 Minute Read
Chemicals Plastic Tupperware
Categories: Chemicals, PFAS

On September 5, 2024, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concurrently issued a direct final rule and proposed rule to change the reporting period and submission deadline for its reporting rule for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) under Section 8(a)(7) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). As previously reported in our first and second installments of “Frequently Asked Questions” and answers about EPA’s PFAS reporting rule, the rule requires entities that have manufactured or imported PFAS, or imported PFAS-containing products and articles, at any time between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2022, to submit detailed reports to EPA within the submission period.

EPA is now proposing to move the start of the reporting period from November 12, 2024, to July 11, 2025, and thereby change the submission deadline for the six-month reporting period from May 8, 2025, to January 11, 2026. Small businesses reporting data solely on importing PFAS contained in articles will have until July 11, 2026, to submit reports. EPA deems the proposed one-time modification of the data submission period necessary and in the public interest because the online reporting tool being developed to collect data will not be fully functional by November 2024. EPA deems the reporting deadline “no longer tenable” because it would require companies to submit data before EPA has the “technological capacity in place to accept that data.” EPA intends for this action to provide EPA with more time to complete its reporting application to ensure reporting entities do not experience technical issues when reporting. EPA attributes the delay in its development of the PFAS reporting tool to its increased responsibilities under amended TSCA, competing priorities, and reduced agency funding.

Additionally, the direct final rule and proposed rule make a technical correction. EPA is revising an inadvertent error in the regulatory text to clarify its intent to receive information only on “unpublished study reports”—not “published study reports”—under the requirement to submit Organization for the Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD) Harmonized Templates (OHT).

This direct final rule will become effective within 60 days of being published in the Federal Register unless EPA receives adverse comments, in which case, the direct final rule will not take effect, and EPA will consider the public comments received and issue a final rule at a later time.

While EPA is likely to finalize this proposed extension of the reporting period and submission date, it is critical for companies to continue their due diligence efforts to compile reportable information under the PFAS reporting rule. As previously reported, the rule’s expansive scope does not have any exclusions for PFAS that are impurities, byproducts, used in commercial research and development (R&D), or only present in a mixture or article in trace amounts. And, unlike many state PFAS reporting laws, this reporting rule is not limited to intentionally added PFAS. Even the importation of one product or product component containing trace amounts of PFAS could trigger reporting obligations. Given these requirements, companies—especially those with complex supply chains or that manufacture or import many types of products—may need months to collect and verify the information that is “known to or reasonably ascertainable by” the company.

For more information, contact Hunton’s Chemicals Team.

  • Counsel

    Javaneh draws on her broad in-house and private practice experience to counsel clients on chemical and environmental regulatory and compliance matters. She assists clients with regulatory compliance, advocacy before federal ...

  • Partner

    Accomplished in the area of chemicals regulation, Greg guides clients through the complexities of regulatory, compliance, litigation, enforcement, and transactional matters. His environmental law leadership spans key ...

  • Partner

    Rachel is a trusted advisor to clients navigating the rapidly evolving landscape of environmental law and corporate sustainability. With over a decade of experience across private practice, in government service, and as in-house ...

  • Senior Attorney

    Paul counsels clients on the impact of environmental law and policy, applying his in-depth knowledge as a PhD chemist to legal issues. Paul is an environmental law practitioner with more than 15 years of experience providing clients ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 5 Minute Read

Perhaps the biggest EPR news to date is the February 6, 2026 decision by the US District Court for the District of Oregon granting the National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors Inc. (NAW) a preliminary injunction to block enforcement of Oregon’s Plastic Pollution and Recycling Modernization Act (RMA) pending a decision on the merits.[1] The Oregon litigation has the potential to affect the scope of EPR programs across the country, potentially extending beyond packaging to other products. In the meantime, product manufacturers and retailers must continue to wrestle with how best to manage EPR compliance and related costs and business impacts.

Time 5 Minute Read

Despite broad shifts in enforcement priorities across the federal government, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) continues to pursue aggressive enforcement of Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) violations. Actions taken by EPA in 2025 to date demonstrate sustained TSCA enforcement, including with respect to chemical regulations and particularly chemical data reporting requirements. Environmental non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are also utilizing TSCA’s Section 20 citizen suit authority to bring lawsuits against companies over alleged reporting noncompliance as well. Chemical manufacturers and importers should stay apprised of these enforcement trends and proactively manage their TSCA compliance strategies to reduce enforcement and litigation risk.

Time 3 Minute Read

In September 2025, federal agencies released their “Spring 2025” Regulatory Agendas that provide an outlook for numerous upcoming regulatory actions on chemicals under the new administration that could have significant implications for the regulated community.

Time 2 Minute Read

On September 18, 2025, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced the agency will be prioritizing the review of new chemicals under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) that are intended for use in data center projects, including the infrastructure that powers data centers, or for the manufacturing of covered components, as defined by Executive Order (EO) 14318, “Accelerating Federal Permitting of Data Center Infrastructure.” This prioritization of reviews will start with submissions received on or after September 29, 2025, and could accelerate time to market for chemistries supporting the expansion of US data center capacity. 

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page