Potential Producer Responsibility Organization Forms to Implement California Textile EPR Program
Time 2 Minute Read
Potential Producer Responsibility Organization Forms to Implement California Textile EPR Program
Categories: Environmental, Waste

On November 3, 2025, the California Retailers Association, the American Apparel and Footwear Association, and the National Retail Federation launched the Textile Renewal Alliance, a 501(c)(3) organization that will seek approval from the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to implement an extended producer responsibility (EPR) program under California’s Responsible Textile Recovery Act of 2024 (SB 707).

Governor Newsom signed SB 707 into law in September 2024, introducing the nation’s first EPR law for textiles. The launch of the Textile Renewal Alliance responds to SB 707’s requirement that textile producers form and join a producer responsibility organization (PRO), which will be responsible for collecting fees from producers and implementing a program to ensure that covered products are collected, sorted, transported, processed, reused, and recycled after consumer use. Prospective PROs must apply and submit a compliance plan to CalRecycle by January 1, 2026, and CalRecycle must in turn select a PRO by March 1, 2026.

Recent experience from packaging EPR programs in multiple states suggests the PRO will have substantial influence over how SB 707 is implemented. Producers should accordingly be on the lookout for opportunities to engage with both CalRecycle and the Textile Renewal Alliance. Near-term opportunities include signing up for email alerts from CalRecycle and subscribing to the Textile Renewal Alliance’s monthly newsletter. The Textile Renewal Alliance has also indicated that it will be offering webinars on producers’ compliance obligations and the SB 707 implementation process. 

SB 707 adds to a growing body of product stewardship programs administered by CalRecycle, including California’s EPR program for packaging and food service ware, SB 54. Although California was the first state to pass a textile EPR law, producer obligations have the potential to expand to other states. In 2025, EPR legislation for textiles was introduced in both New York and Washington. As both states’ legislative sessions have closed for this year, this will be an issue to continue monitoring in 2026. Sellers of apparel and other textile-based fashion items should also continue to monitor potential fashion accountability legislation proposed in several states, as detailed in our prior post.

  • Partner

    Rachel is a trusted advisor to clients navigating the rapidly evolving landscape of environmental law and corporate sustainability. With over a decade of experience across private practice, in government service, and as in-house ...

  • Associate

    Abigail counsels clients on environmental, energy, natural resources, and sustainability-related matters across industries. She represents clients in matters arising under federal and state environmental laws, including ...

  • Associate

    As an associate in the firm’s environmental practice group, Sadie counsels clients on a broad range of issues, such as sustainability, supply chain management, and natural resources. Her experience includes research and ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

California has introduced Assembly Bill 2244, proposing a pioneering “California Certified” labeling standard for foods not classified as ultra-processed. The bill relies on forthcoming regulatory definitions and imposes retail placement requirements for qualifying products. As California continues to advance UPF regulation, this initiative is expected to shape food law trends nationwide.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 1 Minute Read

The California Consumer Privacy Act continues to drive significant enforcement activity—particularly when minors’ data is involved. In a recent action, the California Privacy Protection Agency imposed a $1.1 million fine on youth sports platform PlayOn Sports for alleged violations involving student data and inadequate opt-out mechanisms. The case highlights growing regulatory scrutiny around how companies collect, share, and provide transparency about personal information—especially when schools and students are involved. 

Time 2 Minute Read

On March 3, 2026, the CalPrivacy announced its first enforcement action involving student privacy, requiring PlayOn Sports to pay a $1.10 million fine for alleged violations of the CCPA’s opt-out rights and requirements.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page