Fifth Circuit Vacates Nasdaq Board Diversity Rule
Time 2 Minute Read

On December 11, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in a rare en banc decision vacated the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) order approving Nasdaq’s board diversity rules (Rules 5605(f) and Rule 5606). The Fifth Circuit held that the “SEC failed to justify its determination that Nasdaq’s Board Diversity Proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Exchange Act” and that the SEC’s action was “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” This ruling means that companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange will no longer be required to meet certain board diversity criteria or make prescribed disclosures regarding their board’s diversity characteristics. Nasdaq announced that it does not intend to appeal the Fifth Circuit’s decision. The SEC has yet to announce whether it intends to appeal. However, under the new Trump administration, it is unlikely that the SEC will request further review.

Nasdaq Diversity Rules

Rule 5605(f) and Rule 5606 were approved by the SEC in 2021. 5605(f) required most Nasdaq-listed companies to report that they meet or explain why they do not meet certain minimum diversity objectives for their board of directors, such as having at least two diverse directors. Rule 5606 also required companies to annually disclose information regarding their directors’ self-identified diversity characteristics in a specified matrix format.

Takeaways

With Nasdaq’s board diversity rules now vacated, companies are no longer required to comply with them. However, individual companies are still free to voluntarily disclose board diversity along the lines contemplated in the previous rules, or along any other lines consistent with the law. For example, some shareholders may continue to use such disclosures when making voting decisions, evaluating governance practices, and conducting other assessments. Going forward, Nasdaq-listed companies that choose to disclose board diversity data will have greater flexibility in how they present it, allowing for a range of approaches.

  • Counsel

    Hannah focuses her practice on ESG and sustainability, securities law, and corporate governance for both domestic and international clients. Her experience spans advising on ESG reporting and governance, US securities laws ...

  • Associate

    Chloe is a member of the firm’s corporate team and focuses her practice on mergers and acquisitions, corporate governance, and general corporate law. She also assists clients with a variety of securities law matters.

    While in law ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

In a recent social media post and television interview, Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Paul Atkins announced that US capital markets are "poised to move on-chain.” At the same time, on December 11, 2025, the SEC staff issued a no-action letter to a prominent registered clearing agency and securities depositary to launch a  securities tokenization pilot program. The pilot program will allow participants to transfer tokenized securities to registered wallets of other participants.

Time 2 Minute Read

On November 10, 2025, Chairman John Boozman (R-MT) and Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) of the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee released a discussion draft of legislation regulating crypto markets in the United States. The draft is similar in several ways to the Clarity Act, which the House of Representatives passed in July 2025.

Time 2 Minute Read

On July 7, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Apple Inc. v. NLRB (Case No. 24-60242) handed Apple a victory, declining to enforce the NLRB’s ruling that Apple had violated the National Labor Relations Act by unlawfully confiscating union literature left in an employee breakroom. 

Time 2 Minute Read

On May 29, 2025, staff in the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued a statement on “Certain Protocol Staking Activities.” For certain “staking” activities on blockchain networks that use proof-of-stake (“PoS”) as a consensus mechanism (“PoS Networks”), the SEC staff is of the view that such activities do not involve the offer and sale of securities under the SEC’s Howey test.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page