California Expected to Adopt New Pay Disclosure Requirements for Employers
Time 2 Minute Read
California Expected to Adopt New Pay Disclosure Requirements for Employers

On September 27, 2022, Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 1162, which amends California Labor Code section 432.3, expanding employers’ pay disclosure and record keeping requirements in California.  

Beginning on January 1, 2023, the following changes will be enforced in California:

Job Postings: In any job posting, employers with 15 or greater employees will be required to include the “pay scale,” defined as the “salary or hourly wage range that the employer reasonably expects to pay for the position.”  

Disclosure to Applicants and Employees: Under this Labor Code amendment, employers will be required to disclose a job position’s pay scale to any applicant or employee that requests it for a position in which they are applying or currently work.  This requirement to share pay scale information will apply to all employers, including those with fewer than 15 employees.

Pay Scale Recordkeeping: All employers will be required to “maintain records of a job title and wage rate history for each employee for the duration of the employment plus three years after the end of the employment.”  Such records are to be accessible to the Labor Commissioner to determine whether the employer is engaging in a “pattern of wage discrepancy.”  If an employee brings a claim with the Labor Commissioner against an employer that fails to comply with this recordkeeping requirement, the employer’s failure to maintain these records will create a rebuttable presumption in favor of an employee’s claim.

Possible Penalties: The Labor Commissioner will be empowered to investigate complaints of non-compliance with this law, and if it is determined that an employer violated the statute, the Labor Commissioner will be authorized to order civil penalties ranging from $100 to $10,000 per violation.  The penalty amount will depend on the “totality of the circumstances,” including, whether the employer has previously violated this statute.  However, no penalty will be applied to an employer’s first violation where the employer can demonstrate that “all job postings for open positions have been updated to include the pay scale as required.” Notably, Senate Bill 1162 does not limit the definition of employers to those located or employing workers in California. 

 

  • Partner

    Roland’s practice focuses on employment and labor law. Roland has exclusively handled employment cases since 1992. Roland’s experience includes handling cases of first impression in California involving class actions ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

California has introduced Assembly Bill 2244, proposing a pioneering “California Certified” labeling standard for foods not classified as ultra-processed. The bill relies on forthcoming regulatory definitions and imposes retail placement requirements for qualifying products. As California continues to advance UPF regulation, this initiative is expected to shape food law trends nationwide.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 1 Minute Read

The California Consumer Privacy Act continues to drive significant enforcement activity—particularly when minors’ data is involved. In a recent action, the California Privacy Protection Agency imposed a $1.1 million fine on youth sports platform PlayOn Sports for alleged violations involving student data and inadequate opt-out mechanisms. The case highlights growing regulatory scrutiny around how companies collect, share, and provide transparency about personal information—especially when schools and students are involved. 

Time 2 Minute Read

On March 3, 2026, the CalPrivacy announced its first enforcement action involving student privacy, requiring PlayOn Sports to pay a $1.10 million fine for alleged violations of the CCPA’s opt-out rights and requirements.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page