2022 Retail Industry Year in Review
Time 1 Minute Read

Last year was another remarkable year for the retail industry. We continue to partner with our retail clients through these extraordinary times, striving to provide top-notch, innovative legal solutions and insight. Published yesterday, our 2022 Retail Industry Year in Review provides a comprehensive overview of recent developments, issues, and trends impacting retailers, as well as a look ahead at what to expect in 2023. This year’s publication highlights key topics including cyber insurance, M&A activity, regulation and litigation related to PFAS, labor organizing, developments in ESG disclosure, and more.

Hunton Andrews Kurth advises more than 500 retail clients across a broad spectrum of complex transactional, litigation and regulatory matters in the US and worldwide. Our retail team is comprised of more than 300 lawyers across 20 practices.

Click here to read the 2022 Retail Industry Year in Review.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 1 Minute Read

We recently posted an article on Hunton’s Insurance Recovery Blog about a new Illinois Appellate Court decision that offers concrete direction for retail policyholders evaluating their exposure under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA).  

Time 2 Minute Read

If your company has been impacted by today’s network outage issues, know that insurance may be able to help. Many, but not all, cyber and technology errors and omissions (“Tech E&O”) insurance policies include broad dependent business interruption coverage for losses caused by system failures of a company or vendor on which you rely to operate your business.

Time 1 Minute Read

We recently posted an article on Hunton’s Insurance Recovery Blog regarding the recent system outages worldwide. Companies should review their insurance policies to determine whether they may provide coverage for lost business income due to the outage. For more information click here.

Time 4 Minute Read

Update: On May 1, 2023, the New Jersey appeals court affirmed the trial court's decision that a war exclusion did not bar $1.4 billion in coverage for Merck’s losses stemming from the NotPetya attack.

On June 27, 2017, the skies over New Jersey were clear and the ground steady. But Merck & Co., a New Jersey-based pharmaceutical company, was under attack. Malware ripped through its computers, damaging 40,000 of them and causing over $1.4 billion in losses.

Merck was not the sole target.[1] Dubbed “NotPetya,” the virus tore through the US economy,[2] and did an estimated $10 billion in damage. The US Department of Justice charged six Russian nationals, alleged officers of Russia’s Intelligence Directorate (the GRU), for their roles in the NotPetya attack, among others. The attackers’ goal, according to the DOJ, was:

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page