Hunton Retail Law Resource

Recent product liability cases against A.I. companies are applying traditional product liability theories to a new technology. In February 2026, the California Superior Court for San Francisco County entered an order coordinating twelve cases pending against defendant OpenAI. See In re: ChatGPT Prod. Liab. Cases, Cal.Super. Ct., JCCP No. 5431. Plaintiffs allege that OpenAI’s ChatGPT is unreasonably dangerous and caused psychological harm to plaintiffs or their family members by reinforcing delusional beliefs, endorsing suicidal ideation and providing information to decedents about how to harm themselves, and contributing to users’ psychological deterioration. 

The U.S. Department of Labor recently proposed a rule that would create a uniform standard for determining joint employer status under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act.  The proposed rule has significant implications for employers who share workers or rely on contractors, because a joint-employment finding may expand liability to multiple employers for wage-and-hour violations, leave obligations, and other statutory compliance issues.  The agency has said the proposed rule is intended to “reduce compliance and litigation costs, improve the Department’s ability to enforce the law, and help workers to better understand their rights and available remedies” while also promoting “greater uniformity in the analysis applied by courts.”

On March 12, 2026, we published a blog post discussing the implications of the U.S. Mint ceasing penny production and the various legal and tax implications for multistate businesses. As discussed, each state has legislative discretion on how to address these issues.

A recent decision from the Southern District of New York offers useful guidance for retailers defending website accessibility claims under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. In Jones v. Moscot.com, LLC, the court dismissed the plaintiff’s ADA claim as moot after concluding that the retailer’s remediation efforts and ongoing accessibility measures eliminated any live controversy. As background, Title III of the ADA provides a narrow remedial framework for private plaintiffs, only authorizing civil actions for preventative relief via injunctions and restraining orders. Monetary damages are not available to private plaintiffs for a past violation, so the success of a plaintiff’s ADA accessibility claim depends on a showing that the violation will continue.

California finalized its extended producer responsibility regulations effective May 1, 2026, requiring producers to register by June 1 through Circular Action Alliance or CalRecycle. CalRecycle also launched a new compliance system, while Circular Action Alliance issued non-binding illustrative fees ahead of final rates expected in October 2026.

Maryland’s Protection From Predatory Pricing Act, signed on April 28, 2026 and effective October 1, 2026, is the first state law to directly prohibit certain personalized grocery pricing practices by grocery stores and third-party grocery delivery services, barring the use of consumers’ personal data to set individualized prices or charge higher prices for groceries and restricting discriminatory uses of data relating to legally protected classes. Enforced exclusively by the Maryland Attorney General, the Act includes a guaranteed 45-day cure period, no private right of action, and civil penalties of up to $10,000 per violation, or $25,000 for repeat violations, and it reflects a growing national trend toward tighter regulation of surveillance and algorithmic pricing.