ASTM Releases New Voluntary Safety and Performance Standard for Face Coverings
Time 3 Minute Read

In response to industry and consumer demand created by the COVID-19 pandemic, ASTM International (ASTM) has released a new voluntary standard for the design, labeling, testing, and performance of face coverings.  The new standard, ASTM F3502-21, is the first voluntary standard directed at face coverings and “is intended to establish a national baseline” to allow consumers to make more informed decisions about the face covering products they use.

ASTM F3502-21 specifies several test procedures designed to measure sub-micron particulate filtration efficiency, airflow resistance, and leakage.  Importantly, the standard requires that all tests be performed by a laboratory accredited under ISO/IEC 17025 to perform the tests.  The standard further specifies design requirements, including that face coverings should be made with “non-irritating” and “non-toxic” materials and should not pose a flammability hazard.

The standard also describes labeling and use/care instruction requirements.  Face coverings compliant with the standard will be labeled as “MEETS ASTM F3502”, and product packaging will include information identifying the manufacturer and materials used to construct the product.  If applicable, product packaging will also include re-use and cleaning instructions.  Written instructions will also accompany compliant products and will specify sizing information, how to take the face covering on and off, and how to determine when the face covering should be replaced.

ASTM has made ASTM F3502-21 available to the public via its online reading room, where users can also download a free copy of the standard.

Voluntary standards play a critical role in product safety, particularly when no regulations exist.  Because they standardize testing, performance, and safety aspects for products, voluntary standards hold companies to higher safety standards and increase consumer confidence in product safety.  The development of ASTM F3502-21 also illustrates how voluntary standards can often address evolving product safety needs more quickly than regulations, which can take years to develop and implement.

Companies manufacturing, selling, or providing face masks to employees should consider requiring compliance with ASTM F3502-21 but also should not lose sight of the Consumer Product Safety Commission’s (CPSC) public statements regarding COVID-19 PPE requirements.  As we have previously reported, in October 2020, the CPSC released guidance stating that cloth face masks should comply with the Commission’s flammability, children’s wearing apparel, lead in surface coatings, and written compliance certification regulations.

Although two CPSC Commissioners, Dana Baiocco and Peter Feldman, quickly criticized the CPSC’s statements as a unilateral move taken without briefing of Commissioners or a Commission vote, the guidance remains posted on the Commission’s website.  Thus, unless and until the Commission states otherwise, companies should ensure that cloth face coverings are also compliant with the regulations the CPSC guidance identifies as potentially applicable to those products.

  • Partner

    Ms. Cunningham’s litigation and risk management practice focuses on product liability, toxic tort and environmental litigation, food contamination claims, and wrongful death and personal injury defense, including mass ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

On October 12, 2022, the UK Information Commissioner's Office (“ICO”) launched a public consultation on its draft guidance on employers’ obligations when monitoring at work (“Draft Guidance”). In addition, the ICO has published an impact scoping document, which outlines some of the context and potential impacts of the Draft Guidance (“Impact Scoping Document”).

Time 3 Minute Read

Over the last two years, courtesy of a once-a-century pandemic, government-mandated business closures, nationwide stay-at-home orders, and—unprecedented—disruptions to the global supply chain have illuminated, previously unknown, vulnerabilities across a whole host of industries. Would anyone have seriously questioned the viability of office space two years ago? Now, inflation, in keeping with the recent chaos, may be upending the viability of another tried-and-tested institution: the supply contract.

Time 2 Minute Read

The FTC, through the Department of Justice, has entered a settlement with two companies and the joint corporate President for falsely claiming that the LED lighting products and personal protective equipment (PPE) they sold were “Assembled in the USA,” “Buy American Act Compliant,” “Manufactured in the USA” and “100% Made in the USA,” despite having been imported from China. According to the FTC’s complaint, the defendants, Axis LED Group, LLC, ALG-Health LLC and Adam J. Harmon, went so far as to peel “Made in China” stickers off the products and replace them with Made in USA labels. The FTC had previously investigated and warned the companies, and received assurances that they would remove unqualified Made in USA claims from their marketing materials. The defendants subsequently were investigated by the National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health (NIOSH) over safety superiority claims for their KN95 masks.

Time 4 Minute Read

On June 13, 2022, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights (“OCR”) released guidance to help covered entities understand how they can use remote communication technologies for audio-only telehealth in compliance with the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules (the “Guidance”). Specifically, the Guidance clarifies how audio-only telehealth can be conducted after OCR’s Notification of Enforcement Discretion for Telehealth (the “Telehealth Notification”), put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic, is no longer in effect.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page