Do You Import Products for Commercial Sale? Have You Heard About the ‘Forever Chemicals?’
Time 3 Minute Read
Categories: Environmental

These two worlds are colliding. If any of the products you sell contain hidden ‘forever chemicals’ you will be subject to EPA’s new reporting rule.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are known as the ‘forever chemicals’ due to their high persistence in the environment. There are over 1,300 different PFAS chemistries of varying shapes and sizes. Concerns exist regarding their impacts on human and environmental health. Though certain PFAS have been phased out, some of them continue to be widely used across many sectors and in many consumer products and industrial applications. In many cases, you may not know they are in products that you use or sell.

In an unprecedented and broad action, EPA has proposed a rule that would require reporting of PFAS by manufacturers and importers under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The definition of importers includes those that import articles for commercial purposes, as defined by TSCA. Thus, if you import articles (e.g., clothing, cookware, rugs, electronics, computers, paints, cleaning products, solvents, machinery, automotive parts) and sell them commercially in the US (or have sold them in the past 10 years), if those products contain any of the approximately 1,346 identified PFAS, you would be required to report. Items not covered by the TSCA definition, such as pesticides, foods, food additives, drugs, devices, cosmetics, tobacco products and a few other categories would be excluded; however, the remaining universe is still quite large. As proposed, there is no exemption for de minimis levels, byproducts, or impurities in articles. Further details, and a link to the proposal, are in the blog that can be found here. Comments are due to EPA by September 27, 2021.

The Environmental team at Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP have lawyers and technical personnel located across the nation, with the deep knowledge and vast experience to handle the full range of environmental matters, including PFAS. We have participated in more than 40 US Supreme Court cases and hundreds of cases in the various US Courts of Appeals. We continue to be thought leaders on emerging environmental issues within various areas including in air, water, waste, chemicals, and environmental reviews involving a range of state and federal agency acts and statutes. Additionally, our products and chemicals attorneys have had extensive experience with the issues faced by companies in the energy, automotive, electronic, extractive, chemical, pesticide, manufacturing, pharmaceutical and other industries in domestic and global policy, compliance, enforcement defense and litigation related to new and existing chemicals.

  • Partner

    Accomplished in the area of chemicals regulation, Greg guides clients through the complexities of regulatory, compliance, litigation, enforcement, and transactional matters. His environmental law leadership spans key ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 1 Minute Read

The “prior converted cropland” exclusion exempts certain agricultural lands from Clean Water Act regulation. The 2025 “waters of the United States” proposed rule seeks to clarify and update this exclusion, making it easier for farmers to demonstrate that their prior converted cropland is not subject to the Clean Water Act. If finalized, the proposal could have significant benefits for agricultural producers nationwide.

Time 6 Minute Read

For the fourth time in the last ten years, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed to modify its Risk Management Program (RMP) regulations. EPA will hold a public hearing on the proposed modifications on March 10, 2026, and is accepting written public comment on the proposal through April 10, 2026.

Time 6 Minute Read

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) recently announced it is “exercising its enforcement discretion to no longer pursue criminal charges . . . on allegations of tampering with onboard diagnostic devices in motor vehicles” under the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). According to DOJ, this exercise of discretion not to criminally prosecute is based on “sound enforcement principles, efficient use of government resources[,] and avoiding overcriminalization of federal environmental law.” DOJ’s announcement is an about-face from years of criminal prosecutions for identical conduct, including an increase of these prosecutions under the first Trump administration. As a result of this new policy, DOJ is now dismissing existing CAA criminal tampering cases—more than a dozen prosecutions thus far—and the decision may impact some 20 or more ongoing investigations. DOJ stated in its announcement that it intends to continue to pursue civil enforcement for tampering cases under the Act in partnership with EPA.

Time 5 Minute Read

Despite broad shifts in enforcement priorities across the federal government, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) continues to pursue aggressive enforcement of Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) violations. Actions taken by EPA in 2025 to date demonstrate sustained TSCA enforcement, including with respect to chemical regulations and particularly chemical data reporting requirements. Environmental non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are also utilizing TSCA’s Section 20 citizen suit authority to bring lawsuits against companies over alleged reporting noncompliance as well. Chemical manufacturers and importers should stay apprised of these enforcement trends and proactively manage their TSCA compliance strategies to reduce enforcement and litigation risk.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page