EPA Draws Link Between Low-Dose Formaldehyde Exposure and Cancer
Time 4 Minute Read

On April 14, 2022, the United States Environmental Protection Agency released an updated draft risk assessment for formaldehyde, in which it links long-term, low-dose inhalation of the common chemical to leukemia and various cancers involving the head and neck.  EPA has also identified potential links to non-cancer health outcomes, including sensory irritation, respiratory problems, reproductive and developmental toxicity, and nervous system effects.  The risk assessment associates these potentially adverse health effects with lifetime doses even lower than those identified by EPA in its 2010 draft, which EPA had agreed to revisit after the scientific community and industry stakeholders criticized its methodology.

If the risk assessment is finalized, EPA will officially designate formaldehyde as a known human carcinogen for the first time.  Classification as a known human carcinogen could increase litigation risk for companies who manufacture formaldehyde or whose products may contain the chemical.  The classification could also invite new regulations or even bans under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), pursuant to which EPA is currently separately evaluating formaldehyde’s potential health and environmental risks.

The impact of EPA’s conclusions could be far-ranging—formaldehyde is commonly used in a wide range of industrial and consumer products, including carpeting, flooring, furniture, foam insulation, paints, wood glue, adhesives, cosmetics, and fragrances.  Given the potential business disruption and litigation threat, affected companies should carefully monitor the draft risk assessment as it proceeds through the public comment period and scientific review process.

Risk Assessment Conclusions

In the draft risk assessment, EPA has drawn conclusions about the weight of the evidence supporting a causal link between long-term formaldehyde exposure and various cancer and non-cancer health effects.  EPA’s judgments of the evidence regarding each potential health effect fall into four categories:

  • Evidence “demonstrating” a causal link. According to EPA, the evidence regarding each of the following health effects “signifies a very high level of certainty that formaldehyde exposure caused the health effect”:
    • Nasopharyngeal cancer
    • Myeloid leukemia
    • Sinonasal cancer
    • Sensory irritation
    • Respiratory tract pathology
  • Evidence “indicating” a causal link. According to EPA, the evidence regarding each of the following health effects “reflects a reasonable certainty that the relationship between formaldehyde exposure and the health outcome was causal, although there may be some outstanding questions that remain”:
    • Decreased pulmonary function
    • Allergic conditions
    • Current asthma symptoms or degree of asthma control
    • Female reproductive or developmental toxicity
    • Male reproductive toxicity
  • Evidence “suggesting” a causal link. According to EPA, the evidence regarding each of the following health effects “conveys some concern that formaldehyde may cause a particular health outcome, but there were very few studies that contributed to the evaluation, the evidence was very weak or conflicting, or the methodological conduct of the studies was poor”:
    • Oropharyngeal / hypopharyngeal cancer
    • Multiple myeloma
    • Hodgkin lymphoma
    • Nervous system effects
  • Evidence “inadequate” to make a determination. According to EPA, the evidence regarding each of the following health effects “conveys either a lack of information or an inability to interpret the available evidence” and “generally indicates that further research is needed”:
    • Laryngeal cancer
    • Lymphatic leukemia

Next Steps

EPA is accepting comments on the draft risk assessment through June 13, 2022.  Companies whose operations may be impacted by EPA’s conclusions should carefully monitor the comment docket and consider submitting their own comments.  Following the public comment period, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will conduct a full scientific review of the Agency’s findings.

Companies should also keep EPA’s ongoing TSCA risk evaluation for formaldehyde on their radars.  EPA’s draft IRIS risk assessment almost certainly foreshadows the conclusions EPA will reach in its TSCA risk evaluation.  EPA cannot issue regulations under its IRIS program, but it is authorized to regulate or even ban chemicals if unreasonable risks to human health or the environment are identified in a TSCA risk evaluation.  Although TSCA requires EPA to issue a final risk evaluation for formaldehyde by December 2022, the Agency has already indicated that it could be delayed at least until June 2023 and possibly as late as December 2024.

  • Partner

    Ms. Cunningham’s litigation and risk management practice focuses on product liability, toxic tort and environmental litigation, food contamination claims, and wrongful death and personal injury defense, including mass ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 1 Minute Read

The “prior converted cropland” exclusion exempts certain agricultural lands from Clean Water Act regulation. The 2025 “waters of the United States” proposed rule seeks to clarify and update this exclusion, making it easier for farmers to demonstrate that their prior converted cropland is not subject to the Clean Water Act. If finalized, the proposal could have significant benefits for agricultural producers nationwide.

Time 6 Minute Read

For the fourth time in the last ten years, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed to modify its Risk Management Program (RMP) regulations. EPA will hold a public hearing on the proposed modifications on March 10, 2026, and is accepting written public comment on the proposal through April 10, 2026.

Time 6 Minute Read

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) recently announced it is “exercising its enforcement discretion to no longer pursue criminal charges . . . on allegations of tampering with onboard diagnostic devices in motor vehicles” under the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). According to DOJ, this exercise of discretion not to criminally prosecute is based on “sound enforcement principles, efficient use of government resources[,] and avoiding overcriminalization of federal environmental law.” DOJ’s announcement is an about-face from years of criminal prosecutions for identical conduct, including an increase of these prosecutions under the first Trump administration. As a result of this new policy, DOJ is now dismissing existing CAA criminal tampering cases—more than a dozen prosecutions thus far—and the decision may impact some 20 or more ongoing investigations. DOJ stated in its announcement that it intends to continue to pursue civil enforcement for tampering cases under the Act in partnership with EPA.

Time 5 Minute Read

Despite broad shifts in enforcement priorities across the federal government, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) continues to pursue aggressive enforcement of Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) violations. Actions taken by EPA in 2025 to date demonstrate sustained TSCA enforcement, including with respect to chemical regulations and particularly chemical data reporting requirements. Environmental non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are also utilizing TSCA’s Section 20 citizen suit authority to bring lawsuits against companies over alleged reporting noncompliance as well. Chemical manufacturers and importers should stay apprised of these enforcement trends and proactively manage their TSCA compliance strategies to reduce enforcement and litigation risk.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page