From Produce to Insurance Coverage: What Businesses Concerned About Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) Risks Can Learn From Tony’s Finer Foods
Time 1 Minute Read
Categories: Insurance

We recently posted an article on Hunton’s Insurance Recovery Blog about a new Illinois Appellate Court decision that offers concrete direction for retail policyholders evaluating their exposure under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA).  

This latest BIPA decision, much like the August 2024 BIPA amendments, are key recent developments shaping retailers’ BIPA exposure. Staying abreast of these developments can help retailers avoid or mitigate the effects of BIPA class action lawsuits related to retailers’ use of biometric data in various business functions like employee tracking or customer interaction.

For our full analysis on the decision please see: From Produce to Insurance Coverage: What Businesses Concerned About Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) Risks Can Learn From Tony’s Finer Foods.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 4 Minute Read

In April 2025, the Eleventh Circuit reversed a judgment against a Florida lodge and held that a jury should determine whether the failure of the lodge’s insurer to initiate settlement proceedings before a claim was filed constituted bad faith. In reversing the district court, the Eleventh Circuit reinforced the key duty imposed on insurers under Florida law to diligently and carefully investigate claims and act with an appropriate degree of care to protect their insureds or face consequences such as bad faith liability.

Time 4 Minute Read

It has been nearly two decades since Illinois introduced the first biometric information privacy law in the country in 2008, the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”). Since then, litigation relating to biometric information privacy laws has mushroomed, and the insurance industry has responded with increasingly broad exclusions for claims stemming from the litigation. A recent Illinois Appellate Court decision in Ohio Security Ins. Co. and the Ohio Cas. Ins. Co. v. Wexford Home Corp., 2024 IL App (1st) 232311-U, demonstrates this ongoing evolution.   

Time 5 Minute Read

Just two months ago, Illinois Governor J. B. Pritzker signed significant amendments to the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). While the amendments limit businesses’ exposure to BIPA-related damages, significant BIPA exposures still persist. Given these continuing exposures, businesses should consider the protections that insurance can offer. The Illinois Appellate Court’s September 2024 decision in Tony’s Finer Foods Enterprises v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, 2024 IL App (1st) 231712 offers concrete guidance for businesses thinking about doing just that.

Time 6 Minute Read

Part II of this series, Levels of Protection, addressed the levels of protection available under the SAFETY Act and their associated benefits. This post discusses how a company prepares and submits an application under the SAFETY Act to the Office of SAFETY Act Implementation (“OSAI”) and the important role outside counsel can play in that process.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page