FTC targets Teami’s Unsupported Health Claims and Use of Social Media Influencers
Time 1 Minute Read

On March 6, 2020, the FTC announced a settlement with Teami, LLC and its owners over allegations that the company falsely promoted its Teami brand tea products as capable of curing serious health conditions and causing significant weight loss, supported by endorsements by well-known social media influencers who did not adequately disclose that they were being paid to promote their products. According to the FTC, after receiving a warning letter from the FTC in 2018, Teami implemented a social media policy requiring informative hashtags, but failed to enforce it, resulting in less-than-clear posts. The FTC’s settlement requires Teami to substantiate, with competent and reliable scientific evidence (i.e., random, placebo controlled, double-blinded human clinical testing), any claims that their products treat particular diseases or cause appreciable weight loss. The order also requires clear and conspicuous disclosures of any unexpected material connection and imposes endorser monitoring requirements. Finally, the order imposes a $15.2 million judgment—the total sales of the challenged products—which will be suspended upon payment of $1 million, based on the defendants’ inability to pay the full judgment.

In addition to this action, the FTC sent warning letters to the 10 social media influencers cited in the FTC’s complaint.

  • Partner

    Chris is a partner in the firm’s antitrust and consumer protection practice in Washington, DC. He is a seasoned litigator who represents clients in complex commercial and class action litigation as both plaintiffs and defendants ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

On January 8, 2026, the Kentucky Attorney General announced the first enforcement action against a company for alleged violations of the Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act, just eight days after the law went into effect. The enforcement action is part of a larger legislative and regulatory focus on AI-powered chatbots used by minors.

Time 6 Minute Read

Third-party funding of high-stakes litigation can often make the difference between litigating the case or walking away.  The financial arrangement often makes good sense, with investors helping to facilitate the pursuit of bona fide claims that might otherwise be forgone in exchange for a piece of the recovery.  Insurance coverage disputes fit this model well, since those claims typically involve an insured who has already suffered some financial or other hardship and an insurance company with deep resources that refuses to pay the claim.  It should come as little surprise, therefore, that the Insurance Services Office (ISO), an advisory and rating organization for the property/casualty insurance industry, recently approved a new endorsement that requires disclosure of third-party litigation funding agreements. The approval comes as courts and state legislatures step up demands for transparency in funding to curtail influence that funders may have over litigation strategy.

Time 4 Minute Read

On Tuesday, July 1, FTC Chair Andrew N. Ferguson, issued a statement designating July as “Made in the USA” month.

Time 6 Minute Read

On February 26, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced the launch of a Joint Labor Task Force to “prioritize rooting out and prosecuting unfair labor-market practices that harm American workers.”  

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page