Retail Industry Seeing Significant Increase in Software Audits
Time 2 Minute Read

Companies across all industries, including retail, are seeing a significant uptick in software audits and similar software license compliance reviews. These audits can disrupt the day-to-day operations of even the most efficient IT departments and result in additional license fees, back-maintenance payments, penalties for noncompliance and external legal fees. The more aggressive software licensors may also threaten breach of contract claims, infringement claims, remote disabling of software, suspension of maintenance and other more disruptive practical measures. However, there are ways to limit exposure to such costly software audits and the associated risks, and to even prevent them from occurring in the first place.

The best way to prospectively limit software audits is through strong contractual protection. Ensuring necessary rights are acquired for intended uses and users of the software, and including an exclusive remedy for a breach of the license scope, are just a few protective measures companies may take on the front end to protect themselves against aggressive software compliance audits on the back end. Where possible, companies should also push for self-audit or self-certification provisions. No matter the approach, audit provisions should be carefully drafted and reviewed by internal or external counsel familiar with software audits and the traps set by software licensors often lay for the unwary.

Companies may further reduce their risk by adopting internal procedures for handling software audits. Upon receipt of an audit notice, the IT or internal business team members should immediately contact their in-house legal department. Any further communications between the company and the software licensor should be managed and directed by the legal department.

Download Software Audits - Strategies for Avoiding and Mitigating the Associated Risk for additional drafting and software audit response tips.

  • Partner

    Scott brings in-depth knowledge of SEC policies, procedures and enforcement philosophy to each representation. Scott regularly advises clients across a broad sector of the economy facing sensitive reporting, compliance and ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

On March 5, 2026, the California Privacy Protection Agency announced that the agency had reached a settlement with Ford Motor Company resolving an enforcement action against the company that alleged noncompliance with the California Consumer Privacy Act’s opt-out of sale/sharing rights.

Time 4 Minute Read

In a recent opinion addressing cross‑motions for summary judgment, a Pennsylvania state court set forth a clear holding that policyholders may recover post-judgment interest under excess liability insurance policies only when the policy language expressly says so—and only when the stated conditions are met. The decision underscores the importance for policyholders to thoroughly examine the defense and payment provisions outlined in their insurance policies.

Time 4 Minute Read

On January 27, 2026, the Centre for Information Policy Leadership hosted a fireside chat with California Privacy Protection Agency General Counsel Phil Laird in honor of Data Privacy Day.

Time 2 Minute Read

On January 8, 2026, the California Privacy Protection Agency announced enforcement activity against Rickenbacher Data LLC d/b/a Datamasters and S&P Global Inc. for failing to register as data brokers in California.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page