Retailers Have No Room to Manipulate Reviews: FTC and States Sue Rental Listing Platform Roomster for Bogus Listings
Time 2 Minute Read

The Federal Trade Commission and six states have filed suit against Roomster Corp. and two corporate executives, accusing the residential rental listing platform of using fake reviews and unverified listings to generate tens of millions of dollars in business. According to the complaint, these practices often occur at the expense of vulnerable customers who rely on Roomster to find safe low-cost housing within expensive housing markets.

The lawsuit, filed in the Southern District of New York, alleges that Roomster violated the FTC Act and various state consumer protection laws by falsely representing that Roomster’s reviews were truthful and written by legitimate users of Roomster’s services, and by misrepresenting Roomster’s listings as verified, authentic, and available to rent.

The complaint also names an individual doing business as AppWinn, who is alleged to have provided most of the fake reviews on the Roomster platform. Over a four year period, Roomster is said to have purchased over 20,000 4- and 5-star reviews from AppWinn; AppWinn also used more than 2,500 fake iTunes and Gmail accounts to create fake reviews on Roomster’s mobile apps to drive customers to Roomster.

The complaint also alleges that Roomster regularly advertises fake or unverified listings to lure in customers to sign up for Roomster’s services. The complaint alleges that Roomster does not verify its listings as authentic despite stating otherwise in various places throughout its website.

Separately, the FTC and the states reached a settlement with AppWinn, requiring the owner to pay $100,000 and to cooperate in the ongoing litigation against Roomster.

Let this be another reminder to all retailers: the realm of online reviews is no longer the wild west. The FTC continues its recent trend of cracking down on false or misleading reviews and endorsements. Retailers that feature customer reviews on their websites should be familiar with and adhere to the FTC’s published best practices for soliciting customer reviews and working with review platforms. The states joining the FTC in this action are California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, New York, and Massachusetts.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 3 Minute Read

The Connecticut Attorney General recently issued a legal memorandum regarding the application of existing Connecticut laws, such as the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, to the use of artificial intelligence.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Time 3 Minute Read

On March 20, 2026, Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt signed SB 546 into law, enacting the Oklahoma Consumer Data Privacy Act, which will take effect on January 1, 2027.

Time 1 Minute Read

The California Consumer Privacy Act continues to drive significant enforcement activity—particularly when minors’ data is involved. In a recent action, the California Privacy Protection Agency imposed a $1.1 million fine on youth sports platform PlayOn Sports for alleged violations involving student data and inadequate opt-out mechanisms. The case highlights growing regulatory scrutiny around how companies collect, share, and provide transparency about personal information—especially when schools and students are involved. 

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page