Shareholder Activism at Retailers in 2018
Time 3 Minute Read

Once the sole province of hedge funds and special interest groups, many mainstream institutional investors have now also embraced a more activist perspective with regard to their portfolio companies. In his most recent letter to CEOs, Blackrock chairman Larry Fink advocated in favor of a series of Environmental-Social-Governance (“ESG”) issues and rhetorically asked companies, “What role do we play in the community?” Other institutional money managers, like New York City’s Comptroller Scott Stringer, have also accelerated their ESG-focused shareholder activism in recent years, targeting well-known retailers such as Kroger, Walmart and Home Depot in the process. 

At the same time, in speeches and congressional testimony, SEC Chairman Jay Clayton has begun advocating in favor of “Mr. and Mrs. 401(k)” and similarly situated “Main Street” investors, implying that they have been overlooked in recent years. And after working for many years at breakneck speed to complete congressional-required rulemakings, the SEC under Chairman Clayton appears to be moving at a more measured pace with regard to rulemaking, including completing the remaining Dodd-Frank rulemakings on executive pay. Hot-button issues like political spending disclosure or the use of a universal proxy card in contested director elections have fallen off the SEC’s regulatory agenda altogether. With the SEC appearing to be somewhat less hospitable to activist investors under its new leadership, expect ESG activism outside the agency to expand over the next three years.

Of course, many activists are not focused solely on ESG issues and instead seek to improve operational efficiencies at their portfolio companies. Data compiled by Lazard show that these activists deployed $62 billion in 2017—a record amount—and conducted 193 campaigns globally in 2017, more than double the total capital deployed in 2016. Activists won 100 board seats in 2017, raising their five-year total to 551. Activism around M&A transactions also advanced. Activist interest in prominent retailers such as Whole Foods, Tesco and Dillard’s show that the retail sector is not immune. We do not expect that this trend will abate in 2018.

Recent cyclical trends in the retail industry make it an attractive target for activists seeking to spur management to make operational changes such as improving foot traffic in stores, spinning off valuable real estate, refocusing online strategy or winding down unprofitable lines of business. Each activist situation will require a unique defensive strategy tailored to the demands of the particular activist campaign. But in contrast to years past when many companies reflexively spurned activists, more and more companies are now engaging with activists constructively in an effort to avoid an all-out confrontation. Support of institutional investors can be critical when an activist comes calling, and companies are well served when they build a rapport and develop lines of communications with institutional holders long before a crisis situation develops.

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 2 Minute Read

One novel feature of the 2020 proxy season has been the surge in virtual shareholder meetings. For example, one provider of virtual meeting services reported four times as many virtual shareholder meetings as last year. Although the rise in virtual meetings this year resulted from safety precautions surrounding COVID-19, after weighing the benefits and becoming more comfortable with conducting business remotely, it is likely that many companies will continue to use virtual shareholder meetings or hybrid in-person and virtual meetings in the future.

Time 3 Minute Read

The Council of Institutional Investors (CII) and Templum, Inc. (Templum) each recently submitted comments to the SEC to call for the agency to embrace blockchain technology in a variety of contexts regarding the registration and transfer of securities. The dominant system for clearance and settlement of securities in the United States has its roots in the “paperwork crisis” of the early 1970s, and the resulting regulatory regime based on immobilization of securities is largely inconsistent with a blockchain-based system of traceable shares.

Time 3 Minute Read

For many public companies, the annual meeting voting process is littered with intermediaries and inefficiencies that can result in a lack of shareholder engagement. Proposals are often voted on by proxies instead of by shareholders, oftentimes weeks in advance of the meeting. Few shareholders attend annual meetings in person. Large institutional shareholders may be granted engagement opportunities with management of the company that are not afforded to individual shareholders. These factors can result in a lack of transparency in the voting process and asymmetrical voting power amongst shareholders. Blockchain technology has several potential applications that can remedy these inefficiencies and restore shareholder trust and engagement.

Time 1 Minute Read

Recently, Hunton Andrews Kurth launched a new blog, C-Suite Compensation Center. The blog will discuss compensation issues that are increasingly complex due to evolving laws, changing administrative rules and increasing shareholder activity.

The members of our Compensation practice group are multi-disciplinary within the various substantive areas of compensation. As multi-disciplinary practitioners, we take a holistic and full-service approach to compensation matters that considers all substantive areas of compensation.

Read the latest blog posts.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page