Washington, D.C. Increases Minimum Wage for Non-Tipped Workers
Time 2 Minute Read

Recently, Washington D.C. councilmembers unanimously voted to increase the city’s minimum wage to $15.00 an hour by the year 2020 for non-tipped hourly workers, many of whom work in the retail industry. The news comes just before Washington D.C. is scheduled to increase its minimum wage rate from $10.50 an hour to $11.50 an hour on July 1, 2016. The move makes D.C. the third jurisdiction behind California and New York to increase minimum wages to $15.00 an hour.

Under Bill B21-712, also known as the Fair Shot Minimum Wage Amendment Act of 2016, wages for non-tipped workers will increase each year by approximately $0.70 until 2020 when the minimum wage rate will hit $15.00 an hour. The bill also incrementally raises wages for tipped workers from $2.50 an hour to $5.00 an hour by 2020, and provides for yearly cost of living increases after 2020. Initially proposed on April 19, 2016, by Councilmember Phil Mendelson, the bill drew criticism because it proposed to increase the minimum wage for tipped workers to $7.50 an hour. A compromise was later reached in June when an amendment to the bill lowered the increase to $5.00 an hour. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser announced her support of the bill on social media and has pledged to sign it.

D.C.’s plan to increase its minimum wage is part of a campaign called “Fight for $15,” which also includes Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island and Washington. The campaign affects national and big box retailers in particular, who often have multiple locations throughout the country. Retailers should keep an eye on this campaign as it may affect the wages provided to hourly retail employees on a large scale.

  • Partner

    Bob is a litigator who represents businesses in resolving their complex labor, employment, trade secret, non-compete and related commercial disputes. He is recognized by Chambers USA as a leader in Labor & Employment, and as a Labor ...

You May Also Be Interested In

Time 5 Minute Read

A recent summary judgment order is a reminder that, in insurance coverage disputes, straightforward arguments can still win the day. In a coverage action arising from dozens of underlying personal injury suits, the court adopted a clear, text-based approach to the duty to defend—and ordered the insurer to provide a defense.

Time 2 Minute Read

On April 1, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the 2024 amendment to Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act, limiting damages, applies retroactively to pending cases.

Time 2 Minute Read

California has introduced Assembly Bill 2244, proposing a pioneering “California Certified” labeling standard for foods not classified as ultra-processed. The bill relies on forthcoming regulatory definitions and imposes retail placement requirements for qualifying products. As California continues to advance UPF regulation, this initiative is expected to shape food law trends nationwide.

Time 1 Minute Read

As reported on the Hunton Employment & Labor Perspectives blog, SB 574 is a California bill that would set specific duties for attorneys who use generative artificial intelligence and would restrict how arbitrators may use such tools in decision-making.

Search

Subscribe Arrow

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags

Authors

Archives

Jump to Page